Identification of an influenza A H1N1/2009 virus with mutations in the matrix gene causing a negative result by a commercial molecular assay.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Consolidating the potency of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in viral diagnosis: Extrapolating its applicability for COVID diagnosis?Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2022
   Review
2. MASS SPECTROMETRY IN VIROLOGICAL SCIENCES.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2020
   Review
3. The Drift in Molecular Testing for Influenza: Mutations Affecting Assay Performance.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018
   Review
4. Effect of genomic drift of influenza PCR tests.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
   Article
5. Necessity to critically review the automatic results of the Xpert Flu assay.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2017
   Article
6. Rapid and generic identification of influenza A and other respiratory viruses with mass spectrometry.Journal of virological methods · 2015
   Article
7. Newly emerging mutations in the matrix genes of the human influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses reduce the detection sensitivity of real-time reverse transcription-PCR.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as