Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23553602›Full record

ReviewBiopolymers2013

Peptide design for antimicrobial and immunomodulatory applications.

Evan F Haney, Robert E W Hancock

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biopolymers, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Bioactive peptides extracted from hydrolyzed animal byproducts for dogs and cats.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  19. Blap-6, a Novel Antifungal Peptide from the Chinese Medicinal BeetleInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan F HaneyCentre for Microbial Diseases and Immunity Research, University of British Columbia, 2259 Lower Mall Research Station, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4.
Robert E W Hancock
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Novel adjunctive therapy for drug resistant Gram-negative pathogensR33AI098701 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI HANCOCK, ROBERT ERNEST WILLIAM · 2014 to 2016
$788k
Novel adjunctive therapy for drug resistant Gram-negative pathogensR21AI098701 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI HANCOCK, ROBERT ERNEST WILLIAM · 2012 to 2013
$297k
CIHR MOP-74493NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI098701NIAID NIH HHS R21AI098701NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI098701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing threat of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria and the dwindling supply of antibiotics available to combat these infections poses a significant threat to human health throughout the world. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have long been touted as the next generation of antibiotics capable of filling the anti-infective void. Unfortunately, peptide-based antibiotics have yet to realize their potential as novel pharmaceuticals, in spite of the immense number of known AMP sequences and our improved understanding of their antibacterial mechanism of action. Recently, the immunomodulatory properties of certain AMPs have become appreciated. The ability of small synthetic peptides to protect against infection in vivo has demonstrated that modulation of the innate immune response is an effective strategy to further develop peptides as novel anti-infectives. This review focuses on the screening methods that have been used to assess novel peptide sequences for their antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties. It will also examine how we have progressed in our ability to identify and optimize peptides with desired biological characteristics and enhanced therapeutic potential. In addition, the current challenges to the development of peptides as anti-infectives are examined and the strategies being used to overcome these issues are discussed.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaHumansImmunity, InnateAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic Peptidesantimicrobial peptideshost defense peptidesimmunomodulatory peptides

Identifiers

PMID23553602
PMCPMC3932157
OpenAlexW1790693342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.