Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2014
Effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy in atherosclerotic disease: comparing the ASA low-response prevalence in CVD, CAD and PAD.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Prasugrel in Elderly/Low Body Weight Japanese Patients with Ischemic Stroke: Randomized PRASTRO-II.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Trial
- Effectiveness of Platelet Function Analysis-Guided Aspirin and/or Clopidogrel Therapy in Preventing Secondary Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Additional Risk Minimization Measure to Reduce the Risk of Prescribing Mirabegron to Patients with Severe Uncontrolled Hypertension in Four European Countries.Clinical epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) reduces the risk of ischemic events in patients with atherosclerosis, a substantial number of incidents continue to occur. As only limited data exist we evaluated the antiplatelet effectiveness of ASA in patients with different manifestations of atherosclerosis as in cerebrovascular, coronary artery and peripheral arterial disease (CVD, CAD, PAD). For the evaluation of the antiplatelet effectiveness of ASA we used whole blood aggregometry (Chrono-log Model 590). The patients in the different subgroups received ASA 100, 200 or 500 mg daily. We analysed 737 consecutive patients: 47.5 % with CVD, 33.6 % with CAD, and 18.9 % with PAD. We identified 28.0 % of the CVD, 18.1 % of the CAD and 21.6 % of the PAD patients to be ASA low-responder (ALR). Comparing subgroups treated with 100 mg ASA, 36.4 % were ALR in the CVD group as were 13.1 % of the CAD and 21.6 % of the PAD patients. Multivariate regression analysis revealed an odds ratio for being ALR of 4.50 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.70-11.9) when 100 mg and of 2.97 (95 % CI 1.58-5.60) when 200 mg ASA was taken compared to a dose of 500 mg. Despite the proven benefits of antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease, current antiplatelet management is suboptimal as up to 36 % of patients failed to achieve an adequate platelet inhibitory effect. Our findings may explain, at least in part, the high rates of cardiovascular events observed in the course of atherothrombotic disease and support the need to improve antiplatelet therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.