Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23552621›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2013

Differential freshwater flagellate community response to bacterial food quality with a focus on Limnohabitans bacteria.

Karel Šimek, Vojtěch Kasalický, Jan Jezbera, Karel Horňák, Jiří Nedoma, Martin W Hahn, David Bass, Steffen Jost, Jens Boenigk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differing Escape Responses of the Marine BacteriumInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Karel ŠimekBiology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Hydrobiological Institute, v.v.i., České Budějovice, Czech Republic. ksimek@hbu.cas.cz
Vojtěch Kasalický
Jan Jezbera
Karel Horňák
Jiří Nedoma
Martin W Hahn
David Bass
Steffen Jost
Jens Boenigk
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre · CZUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DENatural History Museum · GBUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different bacterial strains can have different value as food for heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), thus modulating HNF growth and community composition. We examined the influence of prey food quality using four Limnohabitans strains, one Polynucleobacter strain and one freshwater actinobacterial strain on growth (growth rate, length of lag phase and growth efficiency) and community composition of a natural HNF community from a freshwater reservoir. Pyrosequencing of eukaryotic small subunit rRNA amplicons was used to assess time-course changes in HNF community composition. All four Limnohabitans strains and the Polynucleobacter strain yielded significant HNF community growth while the actinobacterial strain did not although it was detected in HNF food vacuoles. Notably, even within the Limnohabitans strains we found significant prey-related differences in HNF growth parameters, which could not be related only to size of the bacterial prey. Sequence data characterizing the HNF communities showed also that different bacterial prey items induced highly significant differences in community composition of flagellates. Generally, Stramenopiles dominated the communities and phylotypes closely related to Pedospumella (Chrysophyceae) were most abundant bacterivorous flagellates rapidly reacting to addition of the bacterial prey of high food quality.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBurkholderiaceaeComamonadaceaeEukaryotaFood ChainFresh WaterGenes, rRNAHeterotrophic ProcessesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23552621
PMCPMC3721123
OpenAlexW2045271495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.