Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23552494›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2013

Phenotypic and molecular differences between rats selectively bred to voluntarily run high vs. low nightly distances.

Michael D Roberts, Jacob D Brown, Joseph M Company, Lauren P Oberle, Alexander J Heese, Ryan G Toedebusch, Kevin D Wells, Clayton L Cruthirds, John A Knouse, J Andries Ferreira and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael D RobertsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Jacob D Brown
Joseph M Company
Lauren P Oberle
Alexander J Heese
Ryan G Toedebusch
Kevin D Wells
Clayton L Cruthirds
John A Knouse
J Andries Ferreira
Thomas E Childs
Marybeth Brown
Frank W Booth

Funding

Exercise &Health: Integration from Molecule to PatientT32AR048523 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI TERJUNG, RONALD L · 2003 to 2013
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32-AR048523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to partially phenotype male and female rats from generations 8-10 (G8-G10) that had been selectively bred to possess low (LVR) vs. high voluntary running (HVR) behavior. Over the first 6 days with wheels, 34-day-old G8 male and female LVRs ran shorter distances (P < 0.001), spent less time running (P < 0.001), and ran slower (P < 0.001) than their G8 male and female HVR counterparts, respectively. HVR and LVR lines consumed similar amounts of standard chow with or without wheels. No inherent difference existed in PGC-1α mRNA in the plantaris and soleus muscles of LVR and HVR nonrunners, although G8 LVR rats inherently possessed less NADH-positive superficial plantaris fibers compared with G8 HVR rats. While day 28 body mass tended to be greater in both sexes of G9-G10 LVR nonrunners vs. G9-G10 HVR nonrunners (P = 0.06), body fat percentage was similar between lines. G9-G10 HVRs had fat mass loss after 6 days of running compared with their prerunning values, while LVR did not lose or gain fat mass during the 6-day voluntary running period. RNA deep sequencing efforts in the nucleus accumbens showed only eight transcripts to be >1.5-fold differentially expressed between lines in HVR and LVR nonrunners. Interestingly, HVRs presented less Oprd1 mRNA, which ties in to potential differences in dopaminergic signaling between lines. This unique animal model provides further evidence as to how exercise may be mechanistically regulated.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAnimalsBody CompositionDNA, ComplementaryEatingFemaleHindlimbMaleMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalNADNucleus AccumbensOrgan SizePeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alphaPhenotypePhysical Conditioning, AnimalDNA, ComplementaryNADPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alphaPpargc1a protein, ratRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription Factorsexercisegenesnucleus accumbensRNA-seqselective breeding

Identifiers

PMID23552494
PMCPMC3680752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.