Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23551721›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2013

Visual hallucinations related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use: case reports and review.

John Doane, Barry Stults

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Case of Lisinopril-Induced Hallucinations.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John DoaneDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. john.doane@hsc.utah.edu
Barry Stults

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four patients experienced visual hallucinations that appear to have been precipitated by lisinopril. Other cases of visual hallucinations have been reported with other angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Older patients, particularly those with a history of either dementia or mild cognitive impairment, may be at higher risk. Hallucinations resolved within 1 to 30 days after cessation of ACE inhibitors. Development of visual hallucinations after initiation of ACE inhibitors should prompt discontinuation of therapy. Visual hallucinations have been reported in one case involving an ARB. Visual hallucinations have not been associated with direct renin inhibitors. Consideration should be given to use of alternative, unrelated antihypertensive drug classes.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overAge FactorsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCognitive DysfunctionComorbidityDementiaFemaleHallucinationsHumansHypertensionLisinoprilMaleRisk FactorsWithholding TreatmentAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsLisinopril

Identifiers

PMID23551721
PMCPMC8033881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.