ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2013
Attitudes of primary care providers and recommendations of home blood pressure monitoring--DocStyles, 2010.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge and practice of home blood pressure monitoring 6 months after the risk and assessment management programme: does health literacy matter?Postgraduate medical journal · 2022Trial
- Home blood-pressure measurement for the diagnosis and monitoring of arterial hypertension by French general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey in the Auvergne region.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Nurse Practitioner: Is It Time to Have a Role in Saudi Arabia?Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2020Review
- The Association of Health Literacy with High-Quality Home Blood Pressure Monitoring for Hypertensive Patients in Outpatient Settings.International journal of hypertension · 2020Review
- Implementing Home Blood Pressure Monitoring into Clinical Practice.Current hypertension reports · 2019Review
- Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among French GPs: A long and winding road.PloS one · 2019Article
- Patient Barriers and Facilitators to Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Qualitative Study.American journal of hypertension · 2018Article
- Barriers to conducting ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring during hypertension screening in the United States.Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH · 2017Article
- Role of Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2015Review
- The evolving clinical management of hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess primary care providers' (PCPs) opinions related to recommending home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) for their hypertensive patients, the authors analyzed a Web-based 2010 DocStyles survey, which included PCPs' demographics, health-related behaviors, recommendations on HBPM, views of patient knowledge, and use of continuing medical education. Of the 1254 PCPs who responded, 539 were family practitioners, 461 were internists, and 254 were nurse practitioners; 32% recommended HBPM to ≥90% of their patients and 26% recommended it to ≤40% of their patients. Nurse practitioners were significantly more likely to recommend HBPM than were internists (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.78). The top reasons for not recommending HBPM were "patient can't afford it" and "patient doesn't need it." A total of 20% of PCPs indicated that their patients were poor to lower middle class; these PCPs were less likely to recommend HBPM to their patients than were those PCPs with most patients in higher economic classes. Additional efforts are needed to provide education to providers, especially physicians, about the benefits of HBPM in improved and cost-effective blood pressure control in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.