Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23551419›Full record

ReviewWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Wound biofilms: lessons learned from oral biofilms.

Kimberly A Mancl, Robert S Kirsner, Dragana Ajdic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effective Healing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Protein-Based Systems for Topical Antibacterial Therapy.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021
    Review
  12. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly A ManclDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.
Robert S Kirsner
Dragana Ajdic
University of Miami · USIn-Q-Tel · US

Funding

Regulation of Streptococcus mutans PTS TransportersR01DE021424 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI AJDIC, DRAGANA · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE021424NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms play an important role in the development and pathogenesis of many chronic infections. Oral biofilms, more commonly known as dental plaque, are a primary cause of oral diseases including caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis. Oral biofilms are commonly studied as model biofilm systems as they are easily accessible; thus, biofilm research in oral diseases is advanced with details of biofilm formation and bacterial interactions being well elucidated. In contrast, wound research has relatively recently directed attention to the role biofilms have in chronic wounds. This review discusses the biofilms in periodontal disease and chronic wounds with comparisons focusing on biofilm detection, biofilm formation, the immune response to biofilms, bacterial interaction, and quorum sensing. Current treatment modalities used by both fields and future therapies are also discussed.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsChronic DiseaseHumansMouthMouth DiseasesQuorum Sensing

Identifiers

PMID23551419
PMCPMC3648594
OpenAlexW1856807984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.