Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23550938›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology2013

Microdosing and drug development: past, present and future.

Graham Lappin, Robert Noveck, Tal Burt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacokinetics, Excretion, and Mass Balance of [Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Successful Use of [Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2017
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Central Nervous System Biodistribution and Pharmacokinetics of Radiolabeled Tofersen in Rodents, Nonhuman Primates, and Humans.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Graham LappinUniversity of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK. glappin@lincoln.ac.uk
Robert Noveck
Tal Burt
Clinical Research Institute · USDuke University · USUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMicrodosing is an approach to early drug development where exploratory pharmacokinetic data are acquired in humans using inherently safe sub-pharmacologic doses of drug. The first publication of microdose data was 10 years ago and this review comprehensively explores the microdose concept from conception, over the past decade, up until the current date. AREAS COVERED: The authors define and distinguish the concept of microdosing from similar approaches. The authors review the ability of microdosing to provide exploratory pharmacokinetics (concentration-time data) but exclude microdosing using positron emission tomography. The article provides a comprehensive review of data within the peer-reviewed literature as well as the latest applications and a look into the future, towards where microdosing may be headed. EXPERT OPINION: Evidence so far suggests that microdosing may be a better predictive tool of human pharmacokinetics than alternative methods and combination with physiologically based modelling may lead to much more reliable predictions in the future. The concept has also been applied to drug-drug interactions, polymorphism and assessing drug concentrations over time at its site of action. Microdosing may yet have more to offer in unanticipated directions and provide benefits that have not been fully realised to date.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicPharmacokineticsAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAnimalsDatabases, FactualDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsGuidelines as TopicHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPositron-Emission TomographyPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID23550938
PMCPMC4532546
OpenAlexW2099918113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.