Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23550724›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2013

Cannabidiol attenuates deficits of visuospatial associative memory induced by Δ(9) tetrahydrocannabinol.

M Jerry Wright, Sophia A Vandewater, Michael A Taffe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A randomised controlled trial of vaporised ΔEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Oral Cannabidiol does not Alter the Subjective, Reinforcing or Cardiovascular Effects of Smoked Cannabis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genotoxicity study ofToxicology reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of acute ΔBrain research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. THC and CBD: Villain versus Hero? Insights into Adolescent Exposure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Effects of daily ΔDrug and alcohol dependence · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Jerry WrightCommittee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sophia A Vandewater
Michael A Taffe
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Neurpsychopharmacology-Multidisciplinary TrainingT32AA007456 · NIAAA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MARISA ROBERTO · 1985 to 2026
$13.4M
TRANSLATIONAL CTR ON THE CLINICAL NEUROBIOL OF CANNABIS ADDICTIONP20DA024194 · NIDA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MASON, BARBARA J · 2007 to 2010
$3.8M
Cannabinoid regulation of cognitionR01DA035482 · NIDA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TAFFE, MICHAEL A. · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007456NIDA NIH HHS DA024194NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA024194NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRecent human studies suggest that recreational cannabis strains that are relatively high in cannabidiol (CBD) content produce less cognitive impairment than do strains with negligible CBD and similar Δ(9) tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content. Self-selection in such studies means it is impossible to rule out additional variables which may determine both cannabis strain selection and basal cognitive performance level. Controlled laboratory studies can better determine a direct relationship. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, adult male rhesus monkeys were assessed on visuospatial Paired Associates Learning and Self-Ordered Spatial Search memory tasks, as well as additional tests of motivation and manual dexterity. Subjects were challenged with THC (0.2, 0.5 mg·kg(-1) , i.m.) in randomized order and evaluated in the presence or absence of 0.5 mg·kg(-1) CBD. KEY

resultsCBD attenuated the effects of THC on paired associates learning and a bimanual motor task without affecting the detrimental effects of THC on a Self-Ordered Spatial Search task of working memory. CBD did not significantly reverse THC-induced impairment of a progressive ratio or a rotating turntable task. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study provides direct evidence that CBD can oppose the cognitive-impairing effects of THC and that it does so in a task-selective manner when administered simultaneously in a 1:1 ratio with THC. The addition of CBD to THC-containing therapeutic products may therefore help to ameliorate unwanted cognitive side-effects. LINKED ARTICLE: This article is commented on by Mechoulam and Parker, pp 1363-1364 of this issue. To view this commentary visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.12400.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCannabidiolCognitionDronabinolFunctional LateralityMacaca mulattaMaleMemoryMemory DisordersModels, AnimalMolecular Sequence DataMotivationMotor ActivityTime FactorsCannabidiolDronabinolcannabisMacaca mulattamarijuanaworking memory

Identifiers

PMID23550724
PMCPMC3838683
OpenAlexW2110553473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.