Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23550161›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Transcription factors interfering with dedifferentiation induce cell type-specific transcriptional profiles.

Takafusa Hikichi, Ryo Matoba, Takashi Ikeda, Akira Watanabe, Takuya Yamamoto, Satoko Yoshitake, Miwa Tamura-Nakano, Takayuki Kimura, Masayoshi Kamon, Mari Shimura and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Cancer: pathological nuclear reprogramming?Nature reviews. Cancer · 2014
    Review
  18. Mechanisms for enhancing cellular reprogramming.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Takafusa HikichiResearch Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan.
Ryo Matoba
Takashi Ikeda
Akira Watanabe
Takuya Yamamoto
Satoko Yoshitake
Miwa Tamura-Nakano
Takayuki Kimura
Masayoshi Kamon
Mari Shimura
Koichi Kawakami
Akihiko Okuda
Hitoshi Okochi
Takafumi Inoue
Atsushi Suzuki
Shinji Masui
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPKyoto University · JPSaitama Medical University · JPDNA Chip Research (Japan) · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JPWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) are able to regulate differentiation-related processes, including dedifferentiation and direct conversion, through the regulation of cell type-specific transcriptional profiles. However, the functional interactions between the TFs regulating different transcriptional profiles are not well understood. Here, we show that the TFs capable of inducing cell type-specific transcriptional profiles prevent the dedifferentiation induced by TFs for pluripotency. Of the large number of TFs expressed in a neural-lineage cell line, we identified a subset of TFs that, when overexpressed, strongly interfered with the dedifferentiation triggered by the procedure to generate induced pluripotent stem cells. This interference occurred through a maintenance mechanism of the cell type-specific transcriptional profile. Strikingly, the maintenance activity of the interfering TF set was strong enough to induce the cell line-specific transcriptional profile when overexpressed in a heterologous cell type. In addition, the TFs that interfered with dedifferentiation in hepatic-lineage cells involved TFs with known induction activity for hepatic-lineage cells. Our results suggest that dedifferentiation suppresses a cell type-specific transcriptional profile, which is primarily maintained by a small subset of TFs capable of inducing direct conversion. We anticipate that this functional correlation might be applicable in various cell types and might facilitate the identification of TFs with induction activity in efforts to understand differentiation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DedifferentiationCell LineChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA PrimersGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHepatocytesMiceMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNeuronsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlasmidsPluripotent Stem CellsRNA, Small InterferingTranscription FactorsDNA PrimersRNA, Small InterferingTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23550161
PMCPMC3631636
OpenAlexW1965436831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.