ArticleFrontiers in psychology2013
Motor-sensory recalibration modulates perceived simultaneity of cross-modal events at different distances.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Walking to your right music: a randomized controlled trial on the novel use of treadmill plus music in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Trial
- Temporal recalibration in schizophrenia: a compensatory timing trap?Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Recalibration of perceived agency transfers across modalities.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Neural correlates of temporal recalibration to delayed auditory feedback of active and passive movements.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Article
- Musical training refines audiovisual integration but does not influence temporal recalibration.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Numerical simulations of one- and two-dimensional stochastic neural field equations with delay.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on sensorimotor and inter-sensory temporal recalibration.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Role of Awareness on Motor-Sensory Temporal Recalibration.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Article
- Fishnition: Developing Models From Cognition Toward Consciousness.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- The perceived present: What is it, and what is it there for?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2020Review
- Audiovisual integration in depth: multisensory binding and gain as a function of distance.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Article
- Auditory dominance in motor-sensory temporal recalibration.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
- Multisensory simultaneity judgment and proximity to the body.Journal of vision · 2016Article
- Grouping and Segregation of Sensory Events by Actions in Temporal Audio-Visual Recalibration.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2016Article
- Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.Experimental brain research · 2015Article
- Binocular summation of chance decisions.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Effects of Auditory Rhythm and Music on Gait Disturbances in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2015Review
- Adaptation to delayed auditory feedback induces the temporal recalibration effect in both speech perception and production.Experimental brain research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A popular model for the representation of time in the brain posits the existence of a single, central-clock. In that framework, temporal distortions in perception are explained by contracting or expanding time over a given interval. We here present evidence for an alternative account, one which proposes multiple independent timelines coexisting within the brain and stresses the importance of motor predictions and causal inferences in constructing our temporal representation of the world. Participants judged the simultaneity of a beep and flash coming from a single source at different distances. The beep was always presented at a constant delay after a motor action, while the flash occurred at a variable delay. Independent shifts in the implied timing of the auditory stimulus toward the motor action (but not the visual stimulus) provided evidence against a central-clock model. Additionally, the hypothesis that the time between action and delayed effect is compressed (known as intentional binding) seems unable to explain our results: firstly, because actions and effects can perceptually reverse, and secondly because the recalibration of simultaneity remains even after the participant's intentional actions are no longer present. Contrary to previous reports, we also find that participants are unable to use distance cues to compensate for the relatively slower speed of sound when audio-visual events are presented in depth. When a motor act is used to control the distal event, however, adaptation to the delayed auditory signal occurs and subjective cross-sensory synchrony is maintained. These results support the hypothesis that perceptual timing derives from and is calibrated by our motor interactions with the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.