ArticleClinical rheumatology2013
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in thrombocytopenia secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The thrombotic burden of high-risk immune thrombocytopenia patients receiving second-line treatments: a systematic review.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Splenectomy in systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune hematologic disease: a comparative analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2018Article
- Review
- Splenectomy increases the subsequent risk of systemic lupus erythematosus.Rheumatology international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in the management of refractory thrombocytopenia associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). From January 2003 to February 2012, 20 patients underwent splenectomy for thrombocytopenia associated with SLE. Of these, 11 underwent open (SLE-OS group) and 9 underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (SLE-LS group). Another 15 patients with ITP underwent LS (ITP-LS group) were categorized as the control group. Surgical indications, perioperative details, and short- (90 days) and long- (median, 42 months) term hematological outcomes were assessed. Splenectomy was successful in all 20 SLE patients. The mean platelet count increased from 23 × 10(9)/L before splenectomy to 289.2 × 10(9)/L and 144.2 × 10(9)/L after 3 and 6 months, respectively, and was 115.5 × 10(9)/L at the last visit, with a 3-month complete response (CR) rate of 100 %. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 17 patients (85 %) had a CR or partial response (PR) to splenectomy plus medical therapy. SLEDAI score and dosage of steroids decreased significantly after splenectomy. None of these patients experienced any postoperative infection, bleeding, or thrombotic events. SLE-LS group had lower volumes of estimated blood loss and postoperative drainage and shorter postoperative hospital stay than SLE-OS group. There were no statistically significant differences between the SLE-LS and ITP-LS groups in operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay. Splenectomy is effective and safe in the management of refractory thrombocytopenia secondary to SLE. LS may be safe and effective in thrombocytopenia associated with SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.