Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23549377›Full record

ArticleGut microbes

A pig model of the human gastrointestinal tract.

Quanshun Zhang, Giovanni Widmer, Saul Tzipori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Restoring low-fiber diets-inducedCurrent research in food science · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The future of phage therapy in the USA.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Advances in CRISPR-Cas9 in lineage tracing of model animals.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Human microbiota-associated animal models: a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. MicroencapsulatedNutrients · 2023
    Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Quanshun ZhangTufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, North Grafton, MA, USA.
Giovanni Widmer
Saul Tzipori

Funding

Development of Vaccines against Clostridium difficile InfectionR01AI088748 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FENG, HANPING, TZIPORI, SAUL R · 2010 to 2014
$3.1M
Evaluation of a new class of antimicrobial agents against Clostridium difficileR56AI094459 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI BOWLIN, TERRY L., TZIPORI, SAUL R · 2011 to 2011
$898k
NIAID NIH HHS AI088748NIAID NIH HHS AI094459NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI088748NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI094459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Easy access to next generation sequencing has enabled the rapid analysis of complex microbial populations. To take full advantage of these technologies, animal models enabling the manipulation of human microbiomes and the study of the impact of such perturbations on the host are needed. To this aim we are developing experimentally tractable and clinically relevant pig models of the human adult and infant gastro-intestinal tract. The intestine of germ-free piglets was populated with human adult or infant fecal microbial populations, and the piglets were maintained on solid or milk diet, respectively. Amplicons of 16S rRNA V6 region were deep-sequenced to monitor to what extent the transplanted human microbiomes changed in the pig. Within 24 h of transfer of human fecal microbiome to pigs, bacterial microbiomes rich in Proteobacteria emerged. These populations evolved toward a more diverse composition rich in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. In the experiment where infant microbiome was used, the phylogenetic composition of the transplanted bacterial population converged toward that of the human inoculum. A majority of sequences belonged to a relatively small number of operational taxonomic units, whereas at the other end of the abundance spectrum, a large number of rare and transient OTUs were detected. Analysis of fecal and colonic microbiomes originating from the same animal indicate that feces closely replicate the colonic microbiome. We conclude that the pig intestine can be colonized with human fecal microbiomes to generate a realistic model of the human GI tract.

Indexed as

MetagenomeModels, AnimalAgedAnimalsBiotaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleGastrointestinal TractGerm-Free LifeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA amplicon sequencingintestinal microbiomemicrobial diversitypig modelprincipal coordinate analysis

Identifiers

PMID23549377
PMCPMC3669164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.