Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23549274›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013

De novo microduplications at 1q41, 2q37.3, and 8q24.3 in patients with VATER/VACTERL association.

Alina Hilger, Charlotte Schramm, Tracie Pennimpede, Lars Wittler, Gabriel C Dworschak, Enrika Bartels, Hartmut Engels, Alexander M Zink, Franziska Degenhardt, Annette M Müller and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Lessons Learned from CNV Analysis of Major Birth Defects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Alina Hilger1] Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany [2] Department of Genomics, Life & Brain Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany [3] Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Charlotte Schramm
Tracie Pennimpede
Lars Wittler
Gabriel C Dworschak
Enrika Bartels
Hartmut Engels
Alexander M Zink
Franziska Degenhardt
Annette M Müller
Eberhard Schmiedeke
Sabine Grasshoff-Derr
Stefanie Märzheuser
Stuart Hosie
Stefan Holland-Cunz
Charlotte H W Wijers
Carlo L M Marcelis
Iris A L M van Rooij
Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Bernhard G Herrmann
Markus M Nöthen
Michael Ludwig
Heiko Reutter
Markus Draaken

Funding

VENOM NEUTRALIZATIONS06GM008107 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-KINGSVILLE · PI GARCIA, MICHELLE R · 1989 to 2010
$5.1M
New genes and pathomechanisms of congenital abnormalities of the kidney (CAKUT)R01DK088767 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HILDEBRANDT, FRIEDHELM · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088767NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM008107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acronym VATER/VACTERL association describes the combination of at least three of the following congenital anomalies: vertebral defects (V), anorectal malformations (A), cardiac defects (C), tracheoesophageal fistula with or without esophageal atresia (TE), renal malformations (R), and limb defects (L). We aimed to identify highly penetrant de novo copy number variations (CNVs) that contribute to VATER/VACTERL association. Array-based molecular karyotyping was performed in a cohort of 41 patients with VATER/VACTERL association and 6 patients with VATER/VACTERL-like phenotype including all of the patients' parents. Three de novo CNVs were identified involving chromosomal regions 1q41, 2q37.3, and 8q24.3 comprising one (SPATA17), two (CAPN10, GPR35), and three (EPPK1, PLEC, PARP10) genes, respectively. Pre-existing data from the literature prompted us to choose GPR35 and EPPK1 for mouse expression studies. Based on these studies, we prioritized GPR35 for sequencing analysis in an extended cohort of 192 patients with VATER/VACTERL association and VATER/VACTERL-like phenotype. Although no disease-causing mutation was identified, our mouse expression studies suggest GPR35 to be involved in the development of the VATER/VACTERL phenotype. Follow-up of GPR35 and the other genes comprising the identified duplications is warranted.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleAnal CanalAnimalsAnus, ImperforateDNA Copy Number VariationsEsophagusFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansKaryotypingKidneyLimb Deformities, CongenitalMaleMiceRadiusReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledGPR35 protein, mouseReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID23549274
PMCPMC3831074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.