Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23548543›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2013

Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation.

Elizabeth E Marfeo, Stephen M Haley, Alan M Jette, Susan V Eisen, Pengsheng Ni, Kara Bogusz, Mark Meterko, Christine M McDonough, Leighton Chan, Diane E Brandt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Reference values for the PROMISBMC public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What facets of physical function are most important to adults diagnosed with cancer?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identifying Work Capacity and Promoting Work: A Strategy for Modernizing the SSDI Program.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB).Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth E MarfeoBoston University School of Public Health, Health & Disability Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA. emarfeo@bu.edu
Stephen M Haley
Alan M Jette
Susan V Eisen
Pengsheng Ni
Kara Bogusz
Mark Meterko
Christine M McDonough
Leighton Chan
Diane E Brandt
Elizabeth K Rasch

Funding

Outcomes Calculators for Informed Decision Making in Back SurgeryP60AR062799 · NIAMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TOSTESON, TOR D · 2012 to 2016
$6.1M
Analyzing the SSA Disability Evaluation ProcessZIACL060065 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI CHAN, LEIGHTON · 2009 to 2025
$0k
CLC NIH HHS HHSN269200900004CCLC NIH HHS HHSN269200900004ICLC NIH HHS HHSN269201000011CCLC NIH HHS HHSN269201100009IIntramural NIH HHS ZIA CL060065NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR062799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical and mental impairments represent the 2 largest health condition categories for which workers receive Social Security disability benefits. Comprehensive assessment of physical and mental impairments should include aspects beyond medical conditions such as a person's underlying capabilities as well as activity demands relevant to the context of work. The objective of this article is to describe the initial conceptual stages of developing new measurement instruments of behavioral health and physical functioning relevant for Social Security work disability evaluation purposes. To outline a clear conceptualization of the constructs to be measured, 2 content models were developed using structured and informal qualitative approaches. We performed a structured literature review focusing on work disability and incorporating aspects of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a unifying taxonomy for framework development. Expert interviews provided advice and consultation to enhance face validity of the resulting content models. The content model for work-related behavioral health function identifies 5 major domains: (1) behavior control, (2) basic interactions, (3) temperament and personality, (4) adaptability, and (5) workplace behaviors. The content model describing physical functioning includes 3 domains: (1) changing and maintaining body position, (2) whole-body mobility, and (3) carrying, moving, and handling objects. These content models informed subsequent measurement properties including item development and measurement scale construction, and provided conceptual coherence guiding future empirical inquiry. The proposed measurement approaches show promise to comprehensively and systematically assess physical and behavioral health functioning relevant to work.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSocial SecurityWork Capacity EvaluationBehaviorDisability EvaluationHealth StatusHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesInterpersonal RelationsMental HealthMobility LimitationPersonalityPsychometricsUnited States5-factor modelConcept formationDisability evaluationDisabled personsFATFFMFunctional Assessment TaxonomyICFInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthMental healthPatient-Reported Outcome Measurement Instrument SystemPROMISRehabilitationresidual functional capacityRFCSocial Security AdministrationSocial Security Disability InsuranceSSASSDIWHOWork disabilityWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID23548543
PMCPMC4010070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.