ArticleBMC genomics2013
Genome sequencing of bacteria: sequencing, de novo assembly and rapid analysis using open source tools.
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioremediation of oil contaminants from the marine ecosystem by Alcanivorax borkumensis: an overview.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Exploring the bacterial diversity and its antibiotic resistance in Kabru Glacier ice cores, Sikkim Himalaya.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Acquisition of plasmids from Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains had low or neutral fitness cost on commensal E. coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Molecular source attribution.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Searching Single Nucleotide-Polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNPs-Targeting a Multiplex Primer for Identification of CommonPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Black pepper and tarragon essential oils suppress the lipolytic potential and the type II secretion system of P. psychrophila KM02.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Development of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-Based Triplex PCR Marker for Serotype-specificPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evolution of Microbial Genomics: Conceptual Shifts over a Quarter Century.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
- Hybrid Atypical Enteropathogenic and ExtraintestinalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A NovelFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Using affinity propagation clustering for identifying bacterial clades and subclades with whole-genome sequences of Francisella tularensis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Article
- Colombia, an unknown genetic diversity in the era of Big Data.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- A k-mer-based method for the identification of phenotype-associated genomic biomarkers and predicting phenotypes of sequenced bacteria.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Comparative genome analysis reveals key genetic factors associated with probiotic property in Enterococcus faecium strains.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Detection, Characterization, and Typing of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Review
- Why Close a Bacterial Genome? The Plasmid of Alteromonas Macleodii HOT1A3 is a Vector for Inter-Specific Transfer of a Flexible Genomic Island.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Revealing crosstalk of plant and fungi in the symbiotic roots of sewage-cleaning Eichhornia crassipes using direct de novo metatranscriptomic analysis.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genome Analysis of Bacillus subtilis Strains Isolated from Non-Salted Fermented Soybean Foods.PloS one · 2015Article
- Live genomics for pathogen monitoring in public health.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDe novo genome sequencing of previously uncharacterized microorganisms has the potential to open up new frontiers in microbial genomics by providing insight into both functional capabilities and biodiversity. Until recently, Roche 454 pyrosequencing was the NGS method of choice for de novo assembly because it generates hundreds of thousands of long reads (<450 bps), which are presumed to aid in the analysis of uncharacterized genomes. The array of tools for processing NGS data are increasingly free and open source and are often adopted for both their high quality and role in promoting academic freedom.
resultsThe error rate of pyrosequencing the Alcanivorax borkumensis genome was such that thousands of insertions and deletions were artificially introduced into the finished genome. Despite a high coverage (~30 fold), it did not allow the reference genome to be fully mapped. Reads from regions with errors had low quality, low coverage, or were missing. The main defect of the reference mapping was the introduction of artificial indels into contigs through lower than 100% consensus and distracting gene calling due to artificial stop codons. No assembler was able to perform de novo assembly comparable to reference mapping. Automated annotation tools performed similarly on reference mapped and de novo draft genomes, and annotated most CDSs in the de novo assembled draft genomes.
conclusionsFree and open source software (FOSS) tools for assembly and annotation of NGS data are being developed rapidly to provide accurate results with less computational effort. Usability is not high priority and these tools currently do not allow the data to be processed without manual intervention. Despite this, genome assemblers now readily assemble medium short reads into long contigs (>97-98% genome coverage). A notable gap in pyrosequencing technology is the quality of base pair calling and conflicting base pairs between single reads at the same nucleotide position. Regardless, using draft whole genomes that are not finished and remain fragmented into tens of contigs allows one to characterize unknown bacteria with modest effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.