Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23547718›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2013

Systematic antibody generation and validation via tissue microarray technology leading to identification of a novel protein prognostic panel in breast cancer.

Patrick C O Leary, Sarah A Penny, Roisin T Dolan, Catherine M Kelly, Stephen F Madden, Elton Rexhepaj, Donal J Brennan, Amanda H McCann, Fredrik Pontén, Mathias Uhlén and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pancancer Analysis of the Oncogenic and Prognostic Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification of a Combined RNA Prognostic Signature in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cancer management and research · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Patrick C O LearyUCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Sarah A Penny
Roisin T Dolan
Catherine M Kelly
Stephen F Madden
Elton Rexhepaj
Donal J Brennan
Amanda H McCann
Fredrik Pontén
Mathias Uhlén
Radoslaw Zagozdzon
Michael J Duffy
Malcolm R Kell
Karin Jirström
William M Gallagher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough omic-based discovery approaches can provide powerful tools for biomarker identification, several reservations have been raised regarding the clinical applicability of gene expression studies, such as their prohibitive cost. However, the limited availability of antibodies is a key barrier to the development of a lower cost alternative, namely a discrete collection of immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based biomarkers. The aim of this study was to use a systematic approach to generate and screen affinity-purified, mono-specific antibodies targeting progression-related biomarkers, with a view towards developing a clinically applicable IHC-based prognostic biomarker panel for breast cancer.

methodsWe examined both in-house and publicly available breast cancer DNA microarray datasets relating to invasion and metastasis, thus identifying a cohort of candidate progression-associated biomarkers. Of these, 18 antibodies were released for extended analysis. Validated antibodies were screened against a tissue microarray (TMA) constructed from a cohort of consecutive breast cancer cases (n = 512) to test the immunohistochemical surrogate signature.

resultsAntibody screening revealed 3 candidate prognostic markers: the cell cycle regulator, Anillin (ANLN); the mitogen-activated protein kinase, PDZ-Binding Kinase (PBK); and the estrogen response gene, PDZ-Domain Containing 1 (PDZK1). Increased expression of ANLN and PBK was associated with poor prognosis, whilst increased expression of PDZK1 was associated with good prognosis. A 3-marker signature comprised of high PBK, high ANLN and low PDZK1 expression was associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (p < 0.001) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (p < 0.001). This novel signature was associated with high tumour grade (p < 0.001), positive nodal status (p = 0.029), ER-negativity (p = 0.006), Her2-positivity (p = 0.036) and high Ki67 status (p < 0.001). However, multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that the signature was not a significant predictor of BCSS (HR = 6.38; 95% CI = 0.79-51.26, p = 0.082).

conclusionsWe have developed a comprehensive biomarker pathway that extends from discovery through to validation on a TMA platform. This proof-of-concept study has resulted in the identification of a novel 3-protein prognostic panel. Additional biochemical markers, interrogated using this high-throughput platform, may further augment the prognostic accuracy of this panel to a point that may allow implementation into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCarrier ProteinsContractile ProteinsFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedanillinAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorCarrier ProteinsContractile ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesPDZ-binding kinasePDZK1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23547718
PMCPMC3668187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.