Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23547136›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2014

Motor cortex broadly engages excitatory and inhibitory neurons in somatosensory barrel cortex.

Amanda K Kinnischtzke, Daniel J Simons, Erika E Fanselow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Circuit Organization of the Forelimb-Related M2-to-M1 Corticocortical Pathway in the Mouse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Motor Control of Distinct Layer 6 Corticothalamic Feedback Circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interareal Synaptic Inputs Underlying Whisking-Related Activity in the Primary Somatosensory Barrel Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda K KinnischtzkeCenter for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA akk31@pitt.edu.
Daniel J SimonsCenter for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Erika E FanselowCenter for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

NEURONAL INTEGRTION IN THE NEOCORTEXR01NS019950 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SIMONS, DANIEL J. · 1985 to 2013
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS19950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomical studies have shown that primary somatosensory (S1) and primary motor (M1) cortices are reciprocally connected. The M1 to S1 projection is thought to represent a modulatory signal that conveys motor-related information to S1. Here, we investigated M1 synaptic inputs to S1 by injecting an AAV virus containing channelrhodopsin-2 and a fluorescent tag into M1. Consistent with previous results, we found labeling of M1 axons within S1 that was most robust in the deep layers and in L1. Labeling was sparse in L4 and was concentrated in the interbarrel septa, largely avoiding barrel centers. In S1, we recorded in vitro from regular-spiking excitatory neurons and fast-spiking and somatostatin-expressing inhibitory interneurons. All 3 cell types had a high probability of receiving direct excitatory M1 input. Both excitatory and inhibitory cells within L4 were the least likely to receive such input from M1. Disynaptic inhibition was observed frequently, indicating that M1 recruits substantial inhibition within S1. Additionally, a subpopulation of L6 regular-spiking excitatory neurons received exceptionally strong M1 input. Overall, our results suggest that activation of M1 evokes within S1 a bombardment of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic activity that could contribute in a layer-specific manner to state-dependent changes in S1.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMice, TransgenicMotor CortexNeural InhibitionNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesNeuronsOptical ImagingOptogeneticsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSomatosensory CortexSynapsesTissue Culture TechniquesGreen Fluorescent Proteinsactive touchcortical circuitsinterneuronsoptogeneticssensorimotor integration

Identifiers

PMID23547136
PMCPMC4148616
OpenAlexW1967573437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.