ReviewPediatrics in review2013
Pelvic inflammatory disease.
Review in Pediatrics in review, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clearance of Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonas vaginalis Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Results From the Tech-N Study.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2020Trial
- Diagnostic Challenges and Management Strategies of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Sexually Inactive Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Clinical Practice.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.