ArticleMycopathologia2013
Genotyping reveals no link between Candida albicans genotype and vaginitis severity in Turkish women.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aetiology of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Ecuador and In Vitro Antifungal Activity AgainstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: An Immunological Perspective.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans isolated from Iranian patients.Medical mycology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have clearly defined the vaginopathic Candida albicans strains that cause severe vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). Therefore, genotyping C. albicans isolates may predict the success of and assist in choosing the appropriate antifungal therapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the genotypes of C. albicans isolates causing VVC with those found in asymptomatic healthy pregnant and non-pregnant women in Adana, Turkey, as well as the antifungal susceptibility profiles of these isolates. A total of 216 independent C. albicans isolates were genotyped by allelic combination based on the microsatellite marker analysis of one such microsatellite, present in the promoter region of the elongation factor 3-encoding gene (CEF3) of C. albicans. The susceptibility testing profiles of all of the isolates against five antifungals and boric acid were obtained retrospectively from our laboratory records. We identified 20 genotypes on the basis of different allelic combinations at the CEF3 locus with a discriminatory power of 0.85. Genotypes 136-144 and 126-135 were present in 50 % of the isolates. No differences existed in the genotypic profiles of fungal isolates between pregnant and non-pregnant women. Remarkably, we did not find a single vaginopathic genotype. All of the isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine, and the fluconazole and ketoconazole resistance rates were 0.9 and 3.7 %, respectively. Therefore, we did not find any correlation between genotype, severity of VVC, and antifungal resistance (P > 0.05). Even so, additional molecular data may provide new insights into the management of VVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.