Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23545573›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2013

Erythropoiesis: development and differentiation.

Elaine Dzierzak, Sjaak Philipsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 228 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The N6-methyladenosine (mBritish journal of haematology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. CD71BMC nephrology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elaine DzierzakErasmus MC, Erasmus Stem Cell Institute, Department of Cell Biology, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.dzierzak@erasmusmc.nl
Sjaak Philipsen

Funding

Characterization of the first HSCs during mouse ontogenyR37DK054077 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH · PI DZIERZAK, ELAINE A · 2006 to 2015
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK054077NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK54077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through their oxygen delivery function, red blood cells are pivotal to the healthy existence of all vertebrate organisms. These cells are required during all stages of life--embryonic, fetal, neonatal, adolescent, and adult. In the adult, red blood cells are the terminally differentiated end-product cells of a complex hierarchy of hematopoietic progenitors that become progressively restricted to the erythroid lineage. During this stepwise differentiation process, erythroid progenitors undergo enormous expansion, so as to fulfill the daily requirement of ~2 × 10(11) new erythrocytes. How the erythroid lineage is made has been a topic of intense research over the last decades. Developmental studies show that there are two types of red blood cells--embryonic and adult. They develop from distinct hemogenic/hematopoietic progenitors in different anatomical sites and show distinct genetic programs. This article highlights the developmental and differentiation events necessary in the production of hemoglobin-producing red blood cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationEmbryonic DevelopmentErythrocytesErythropoiesisGrowth and DevelopmentHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23545573
PMCPMC3684002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.