ReviewHearing research2013
The dominant role of inhibition in creating response selectivities for communication calls in the brainstem auditory system.
Review in Hearing research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Candidate Key Proteins in Thalamo-Amygdala Signaling in Tinnitus: A Bioinformatics Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Optogenetic stimulation of inferior colliculus neurons elicits mesencephalic locomotor region activity and reverses haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Candidate Key Proteins in Tinnitus-A Bioinformatic Study of Synaptic Transmission in the Inferior Colliculus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Lineage-tracing reveals an expanded population of NPY neurons in the inferior colliculus.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Lineage-tracing reveals an expanded population of NPY neurons in the inferior colliculus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Deviance Detection to Natural Stimuli in Population Responses of the Brainstem of Bats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Differences in dogs' event-related potentials in response to human and dog vocal stimuli; a non-invasive study.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- [Communication sound recognition and response modification in the secondary auditory cortex of female mice].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021Article
- Neuronal selectivity to complex vocalization features emerges in the superficial layers of primary auditory cortex.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Juxtacellular Labeling of Stellate, Disk and Basket Neurons in the Central Nucleus of the Guinea Pig Inferior Colliculus.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Auditory processing in the zebra finch midbrain: single unit responses and effect of rearing experience.PeerJ · 2020Article
- GABAJournal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Optimal features for auditory categorization.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.Hearing research · 2018Review
- Serotonin, estrus, and social context influence c-Fos immunoreactivity in the inferior colliculus.Behavioral neuroscience · 2016Article
- Extracellular Molecular Markers and Soma Size of Inhibitory Neurons: Evidence for Four Subtypes of GABAergic Cells in the Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- The superior paraolivary nucleus shapes temporal response properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus.Brain structure & function · 2015Article
- High-field functional magnetic resonance imaging of vocalization processing in marmosets.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Responses to Social Vocalizations in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus of Mice.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- Context-dependent fluctuation of serotonin in the auditory midbrain: the influence of sex, reproductive state and experience.The Journal of experimental biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This review is concerned with how communication calls are processed and represented by populations of neurons in both the inferior colliculus (IC), the auditory midbrain nucleus, and the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL), the nucleus just caudal to the IC. The review has five sections where focus in each section is on inhibition and its role in shaping response selectivity for communication calls. In the first section, the lack of response selectivity for calls in DNLL neurons is presented and discusses why inhibition plays virtually no role in shaping selectivity. In the second section, the lack of selectivity in the DNLL is contrasted with the high degree of response selectivity in the IC. The third section then reviews how inhibition in the IC shapes response selectivities for calls, and how those selectivities can create a population response with a distinctive response profile to a particular call, which differs from the population profile evoked by any other call. The fourth section is concerned with the specifics of inhibition in the IC, and how the interaction of excitation and inhibition creates directional selectivities for frequency modulations, one of the principal acoustic features of communication signals. The two major hypotheses for directional selectivity are presented. One is the timing hypothesis, which holds that the precise timing of excitation relative to inhibition is the feature that shapes directionality. The other hypothesis is that the relative magnitudes of excitation and inhibition are the dominant features that shape directionality, where timing is relatively unimportant. The final section then turns to the role of serotonin, a neuromodulator that can markedly change responses to calls in the IC. Serotonin provides a linkage between behavioral states and processing. This linkage is discussed in the final section together with the hypothesis that serotonin acts to enhances the contrast in the population responses to various calls over and above the distinctive population responses that were created by inhibition. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Communication Sounds and the Brain: New Directions and Perspectives".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.