Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23544670›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2013

Acute preconditioning of cardiac progenitor cells with hydrogen peroxide enhances angiogenic pathways following ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Karl D Pendergrass, Archana V Boopathy, Gokulakrishnan Seshadri, Kathryn Maiellaro-Rafferty, Pao Lin Che, Milton E Brown, Michael E Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Optimal HStem cell research & therapy · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Protective Effect of a Novel Polysaccharide fromBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Stem Cell Therapy for the Heart: Blind Alley or Magic Bullet?Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2016
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karl D PendergrassWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Archana V Boopathy
Gokulakrishnan Seshadri
Kathryn Maiellaro-Rafferty
Pao Lin Che
Milton E Brown
Michael E Davis
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

T cell triggering events and hypertensionP01HL095070 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JO, HANJOONG · 2009 to 2019
$20.5M
Catalase therapy for cardiac regenerationR01HL094527 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL E · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL007745NHLBI NIH HHS HL094527NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL095070NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094527NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD006426-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are a limited number of therapies available to prevent heart failure following myocardial infarction. One novel therapy that is currently being pursued is the implantation of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs); however, their responses to oxidative stress during differentiation have yet to be elucidated. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) treatment on CPC differentiation in vitro, as well as the effect of H2O2 preconditioning before implantation following ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. CPCs were isolated and cloned from adult rat hearts, and then cultured in the absence or presence of H2O2 for 2 or 5 days. CPC survival was assessed with Annexin V, and cellular differentiation was evaluated through mRNA expression for cardiogenic genes. We found that 100 μM H2O2 decreased serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis by at least 45% following both 2 and 5 days of treatment. Moreover, 100 μM H2O2 treatment for 2 days significantly increased endothelial and smooth muscle markers compared to time-matched untreated CPCs. However, continued H2O2 treatment significantly decreased these markers. Left ventricular cardiac function was assessed 28 days after I/R and I/R with the implantation of Luciferase/GFP(+) CPCs, which were preconditioned with 100 μM H2O2 for 2 days. Hearts implanted with Luciferase/GFP(+) CPCs had significant improvement in both positive and negative dP/dT over I/R. Furthermore, cardiac fibrosis was significantly decreased in the preconditioned cells versus both I/R alone and I/R with control cells. We also observed a significant increase in endothelial cell density in the preconditioned CPC hearts compared to untreated CPC hearts, which also coincided with a higher density of Luciferase(+) vessels. These findings suggest that preconditioning of CPCs with H2O2 for 2 days stimulates neoangiogenesis in the peri-infarct area following I/R injury and could be a viable therapeutic option to prevent heart failure.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedFibrosisGene ExpressionHeart FailureHydrogen PeroxideIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialMaleMyocardial ContractionMyocardial InfarctionNeovascularization, PhysiologicRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReperfusion InjuryHydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID23544670
PMCPMC3749704
OpenAlexW2017068971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.