Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23544600›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2013

Two functional serotonin polymorphisms moderate the effect of food reinforcement on BMI.

Katelyn A Carr, Henry Lin, Kelly D Fletcher, Lara Sucheston, Prashant K Singh, Robbert J Salis, Richard W Erbe, Myles S Faith, David B Allison, Eric Stice and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Katelyn A CarrDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14214-3000, USA.
Henry Lin
Kelly D Fletcher
Lara Sucheston
Prashant K Singh
Robbert J Salis
Richard W Erbe
Myles S Faith
David B Allison
Eric Stice
Leonard H Epstein
Buffalo State University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USMemorial Hospital of South Bend · USOregon Research Institute · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Food reinforcement-genotype interactions and eatingR01DA024883 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2007 to 2010
$997k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024883NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food reinforcement, or the motivation to eat, has been associated with increased energy intake, greater body weight, and prospective weight gain. Much of the previous research on the reinforcing value of food has focused on the role of dopamine, but it may be worthwhile to examine genetic polymorphisms in the serotonin and opioid systems as these neurotransmitters have been shown to be related to reinforcement processes and to influence energy intake. We examined the relationship among 44 candidate genetic polymorphisms in the dopamine, serotonin, and opioid systems, as well as food reinforcement and body mass index (BMI) in a sample of 245 individuals. Polymorphisms in the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA-LPR) and serotonin receptor 2A genes (rs6314) moderated the effect of food reinforcement on BMI, accounting for an additional 5-10% variance and revealed a potential role of the single nucleotide polymorphism, rs6314, in the serotonin 2A receptor as a differential susceptibility factor for obesity. Differential susceptibility describes a factor that can confer either risk or protection depending on a second variable, such that rs6314 is predictive of both high and low BMI based on the level of food reinforcement, while the diathesis stress or dual-gain model only influences one end of the outcome measure. The interaction with MAOA-LPR better fits the diathesis stress model, with the 3.5R/4R allele conferring protection for individuals low in food reinforcement. These results provide new insight into genes theoretically involved in obesity, and support the hypothesis that genetics moderate the association between food reinforcement and BMI.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexFoodReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultCatechol O-MethyltransferaseConditioning, OperantEatingEnergy IntakeFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonoamine OxidaseCatechol O-MethyltransferaseMonoamine Oxidasemonoamine oxidase A, humanReceptors, DopamineReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2ATyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

Identifiers

PMID23544600
PMCPMC4049455
OpenAlexW1989344043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.