Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23544118›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Conservation priorities for Prunus africana defined with the aid of spatial analysis of genetic data and climatic variables.

Barbara Vinceti, Judy Loo, Hannes Gaisberger, Maarten J van Zonneveld, Silvio Schueler, Heino Konrad, Caroline A C Kadu, Thomas Geburek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phytochemical Analysis and Antioxidant Activities ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent Advances inNutrients · 2019
    Review
  10. Molecular analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prunus africana (Hook.f.) Kalkman: the overexploitation of a medicinal plant species and its legal context.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Barbara VincetiHeadquarters, Bioversity International, Rome, Italy. b.vinceti@cgiar.org
Judy Loo
Hannes Gaisberger
Maarten J van Zonneveld
Silvio Schueler
Heino Konrad
Caroline A C Kadu
Thomas Geburek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation priorities for Prunus africana, a tree species found across Afromontane regions, which is of great commercial interest internationally and of local value for rural communities, were defined with the aid of spatial analyses applied to a set of georeferenced molecular marker data (chloroplast and nuclear microsatellites) from 32 populations in 9 African countries. Two approaches for the selection of priority populations for conservation were used, differing in the way they optimize representation of intra-specific diversity of P. africana across a minimum number of populations. The first method (S1) was aimed at maximizing genetic diversity of the conservation units and their distinctiveness with regard to climatic conditions, the second method (S2) at optimizing representativeness of the genetic diversity found throughout the species' range. Populations in East African countries (especially Kenya and Tanzania) were found to be of great conservation value, as suggested by previous findings. These populations are complemented by those in Madagascar and Cameroon. The combination of the two methods for prioritization led to the identification of a set of 6 priority populations. The potential distribution of P. africana was then modeled based on a dataset of 1,500 georeferenced observations. This enabled an assessment of whether the priority populations identified are exposed to threats from agricultural expansion and climate change, and whether they are located within the boundaries of protected areas. The range of the species has been affected by past climate change and the modeled distribution of P. africana indicates that the species is likely to be negatively affected in future, with an expected decrease in distribution by 2050. Based on these insights, further research at the regional and national scale is recommended, in order to strengthen P. africana conservation efforts.

Indexed as

ClimateConservation of Natural ResourcesSpatial AnalysisStatistics as TopicAfricaAllelesCluster AnalysisGenetic VariationGeographyHaplotypesModels, GeneticPrunus africana

Identifiers

PMID23544118
PMCPMC3609728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.