Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23544095›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Light-emitting channelrhodopsins for combined optogenetic and chemical-genetic control of neurons.

Ken Berglund, Elisabeth Birkner, George J Augustine, Ute Hochgeschwender

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bioluminescent Systems for Theranostic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An Innovative Mitochondrial-targeted Gene Therapy for Cancer Treatment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Engineering luminopsins with improved coupling efficiencies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ken BerglundDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Elisabeth Birkner
George J Augustine
Ute Hochgeschwender
Duke University · USDuke-NUS Medical School · SG

Funding

Project 2 - neurotransgenic core - Neuroscience Infrastructure at Duke UniversityP30NS061789 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2008 to 2013
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS061789NINDS NIH HHS P30NS061789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manipulation of neuronal activity through genetically targeted actuator molecules is a powerful approach for studying information flow in the brain. In these approaches the genetically targeted component, a receptor or a channel, is activated either by a small molecule (chemical genetics) or by light from a physical source (optogenetics). We developed a hybrid technology that allows control of the same neurons by both optogenetic and chemical genetic means. The approach is based on engineered chimeric fusions of a light-generating protein (luciferase) to a light-activated ion channel (channelrhodopsin). Ionic currents then can be activated by bioluminescence upon activation of luciferase by its substrate, coelenterazine (CTZ), as well as by external light. In cell lines, expression of the fusion of Gaussia luciferase to Channelrhodopsin-2 yielded photocurrents in response to CTZ. Larger photocurrents were produced by fusing the luciferase to Volvox Channelrhodopsin-1. This version allowed chemical modulation of neuronal activity when expressed in cultured neurons: CTZ treatment shifted neuronal responses to injected currents and sensitized neurons to fire action potentials in response to subthreshold synaptic inputs. These luminescent channelrhodopsins--or luminopsins--preserve the advantages of light-activated ion channels, while extending their capabilities. Our proof-of-principle results suggest that this novel class of tools can be improved and extended in numerous ways.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsHEK293 CellsHumansLuciferasesLuminescent MeasurementsNeuronsOptogeneticsPC12 CellsRatsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRhodopsinSignal TransductionVolvoxLuciferasesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID23544095
PMCPMC3609769
OpenAlexW2103459278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.