ArticlePloS one2013
Conditional deletion of Jak2 reveals an essential role in hematopoiesis throughout mouse ontogeny: implications for Jak2 inhibition in humans.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of hematological changes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with different Janus kinase inhibitors: a real-world study.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- A case displaying the importance of JAK1 and JAK2 gene transcription in antifungal defense against coccidioidomycosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Real-Life Use of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- JAK inhibitors: an evidence-based choice of the most appropriate molecule.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Jak2 and Jaw Muscles Are Required for Buccopharyngeal Membrane Perforation during Mouth Development.Journal of developmental biology · 2023Article
- Evaluating risk detection methods to uncover ontogenic-mediated adverse drug effect mechanisms in children.BioData mining · 2021Article
- JAK selectivity and the implications for clinical inhibition of pharmacodynamic cytokine signalling by filgotinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib and baricitinib.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2021Article
- Untwining Anti-Tumor and Immunosuppressive Effects of JAK Inhibitors-A Strategy for Hematological Malignancies?Cancers · 2021Review
- Inhibition of JAK2 Suppresses Myelopoiesis and Atherosclerosis in ApoeCardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2020Article
- Review
- Progress in elucidation of molecular pathophysiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms and its application to therapeutic decisions.International journal of hematology · 2020Review
- Systems-Based Interactome Analysis for Hematopoiesis Effect of Angelicae sinensis Radix: Regulated Network of Cell Proliferation towards Hemopoiesis.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2019Article
- Janus kinases to jakinibs: from basic insights to clinical practice.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2019Review
- New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019Review
- Upadacitinib and filgotinib: the role of JAK1 selective inhibition in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Drugs in context · 2019Review
- JAK/STAT Cytokine Signaling at the Crossroad of NK Cell Development and Maturation.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- [Advances in research on axial spondyloarthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2018Article
- Design, synthesis and evaluation of (MedChemComm · 2018Article
- Mouse Models of Erythropoiesis and Associated Diseases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018Review
- H3K27 Methylation Dynamics during CD4 T Cell Activation: Regulation of JAK/STAT and IL12RB2 Expression by JMJD3.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Germline deletion of Jak2 in mice results in embryonic lethality at E12.5 due to impaired hematopoiesis. However, the role that Jak2 might play in late gestation and postnatal life is unknown. To understand this, we utilized a conditional knockout approach that allowed for the deletion of Jak2 at various stages of prenatal and postnatal life. Specifically, Jak2 was deleted beginning at either mid/late gestation (E12.5), at postnatal day 4 (PN4), or at ∼2 months of age. Deletion of Jak2 beginning at E12.5 resulted in embryonic death characterized by a lack of hematopoiesis. Deletion beginning at PN4 was also lethal due to a lack of erythropoiesis. Deletion of Jak2 in young adults was characterized by blood cytopenias, abnormal erythrocyte morphology, decreased marrow hematopoietic potential, and splenic atrophy. However, death was observed in only 20% of the mutants. Further analysis of these mice suggested that the increased survivability was due to an incomplete deletion of Jak2 and subsequent re-population of Jak2 expressing cells, as conditional deletion in mice having one floxed Jak2 allele and one null allele resulted in a more severe phenotype and subsequent death of all animals. We found that the deletion of Jak2 in the young adults had a differential effect on hematopoietic lineages; specifically, conditional Jak2 deletion in young adults severely impaired erythropoiesis and thrombopoiesis, modestly affected granulopoiesis and monocytopoiesis, and had no effect on lymphopoiesis. Interestingly, while the hematopoietic organs of these mutant animals were severely affected by the deletion of Jak2, we found that the hearts, kidneys, lungs, and brains of these same mice were histologically normal. From this, we conclude that Jak2 plays an essential and non-redundant role in hematopoiesis during both prenatal and postnatal life and this has direct implications regarding the inhibition of Jak2 in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.