Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23544077›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

rs12512631 on the group specific complement (vitamin D-binding protein GC) implicated in melanoma susceptibility.

Maria Peña-Chilet, Maider Ibarrola-Villava, Manuel Martin-González, Marta Feito, Cristina Gomez-Fernandez, Dolores Planelles, Gregorio Carretero, Ana Lluch, Eduardo Nagore, Gloria Ribas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-analysis on vitamin D receptor and cancer risk: focus on the role of TaqI, ApaI, and Cdx2 polymorphisms.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Vitamin D status and risk for malignant cutaneous melanoma: recent advances.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2017
    Review
  9. Vitamin D signaling and melanoma: role of vitamin D and its receptors in melanoma progression and management.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Peña-ChiletMedical Oncology and Haematology Unit, Health Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain.
Maider Ibarrola-Villava
Manuel Martin-González
Marta Feito
Cristina Gomez-Fernandez
Dolores Planelles
Gregorio Carretero
Ana Lluch
Eduardo Nagore
Gloria Ribas
INCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolar radiation should be avoided in melanoma patients. Nevertheless, this is the main means by which the body produces vitamin D. Evidence suggests a protective role against cancer for vitamin D. Since vitamin D performs its function by binding the receptor encoded by the vitamin D-receptor gene (VDR), most studies have focused on polymorphisms (SNPs) within this gene. However, the gene encoding the vitamin D-binding protein (GC) appears in recent studies as a major player in the role of a serum vitamin D level regulator and in Cutaneous Melanoma (CM) predisposition.

methodsWe performed a case-control study of 12 polymorphisms on GC and 9 on VDR among 530 cases and 314 controls from Spanish population.

resultsWe found association between SNP rs12512631, located 3'downstream of GC, and risk of CM that seems to fit a dominant model (OR 1.63 95%CI 1.23-2.17 p-value 7×10(-4)). This association remained Bonferroni's correction and after adjustment for potential confounders (p-value 3×10(-3)) and even after increasing the sample size to 1729 individuals (p-value 0.0129). Moreover, we confirmed evidence of an association between CM susceptibility and the linkage disequilibrium block marked by tag-SNP rs222016 (p-value 0.032). This block covers the GC intron 1 region, with probable regulatory functions.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first vitamin D pathway-related polymorphism study in melanoma risk conducted in the Spanish population. Furthermore, we show an association between polymorphisms in GC and melanoma risk, confirming recent studies in different populations.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAllelesCase-Control StudiesFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Association StudiesHaplotypesHumansMaleMelanomaPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsSpainVitamin D-Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID23544077
PMCPMC3609832
OpenAlexW2031738355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.