Escherichia coli shapeshifters.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cell wall damage increases macromolecular crowding effects in theiScience · 2023
   Article
2. The evolution of spherical cell shape; progress and perspective.Biochemical Society transactions · 2019
   Review
3. Morphological plasticity of bacteria-Open questions.Biomicrofluidics · 2016
   Review
4. Bacteria under the physical constraints of periodic micro-nanofluidic junctions reveal morphological plasticity and dynamic shifting of Min patterns.Biomicrofluidics · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The Rcs stress response and accessory envelope proteins are required for de novo generation of cell shape in Escherichia coli.2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as