Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23543550›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast.

Christa A Stojkovic, Mark J C Smeulders, Chantal M Van der Horst, Sameena M Khan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using Drains to Prevent Seroma Formation after Breast Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christa A StojkovicDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands. c.a.stojkovic@hotmail.com.
Mark J C Smeulders
Chantal M Van der Horst
Sameena M Khan
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWound drains are often used after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast, in order to reduce potential complications. It is unclear whether there is any evidence to support this practice and we therefore undertook a systematic review of the best evidence available.

objectivesTo compare the safety and efficacy of the use of wound drains following elective plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures of the breast. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 3 August 2012); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 7); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to July Week 4 2012); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations August 2, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2012 Week 30); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 2 August 2012). There were no restrictions on the basis of date or language of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two review authors undertook independent screening of the search results. All randomised trials that compared the use of a wound drain with no wound drain following plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast (breast augmentation, breast reduction and breast reconstruction) in women were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors undertook independent data extraction of study characteristics, methodological quality and outcomes (e.g. infection, other wound complications, pain, and length of hospital stay). Risk of bias was assessed independently by two review authors. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. MAIN

resultsThree randomised trials were identified and included in the review out of 109 studies that were initially screened; all evaluated wound drainage after breast reduction surgery. In total there were 306 women in the three trials, and 505 breasts were studied (254 drained, and 251 who were not drained). Apart from a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay for those participants who did not have drains (MD 0.77; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.14), there was no statistically significant impact of the use of drains on outcomes. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe limited evidence available shows no significant benefit of using post-operative wound drains in reduction mammoplasty, though hospital stay may be shorter when drains are not used. No data are available for breast augmentation or breast reconstruction, and this requires investigation.

Indexed as

DrainageLength of StayFemaleHumansMammaplastyPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23543550
OpenAlexW4238841971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.