SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized clinical trial of topical tranexamic acid after reduction mammoplasty.The British journal of surgery · 2015Trial
- A Retrospective Review of Arthroscopic Shaver Utilization in Adolescent Gynecomastia.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Final 24-hour Drain Output and Postoperative Day Are Poor Indicators for Appropriate Drain Removal.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- Using Drains to Prevent Seroma Formation after Breast Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019Article
- The use of the Alexis(®) device in breast augmentation to improve outcomes: a comparative randomized case-control survey.Gland surgery · 2016Article
- Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery: Its Rise, Importance, and a Practical Guide.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2016Review
- Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWound drains are often used after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast, in order to reduce potential complications. It is unclear whether there is any evidence to support this practice and we therefore undertook a systematic review of the best evidence available.
objectivesTo compare the safety and efficacy of the use of wound drains following elective plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures of the breast. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 3 August 2012); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 7); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to July Week 4 2012); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations August 2, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2012 Week 30); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 2 August 2012). There were no restrictions on the basis of date or language of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two review authors undertook independent screening of the search results. All randomised trials that compared the use of a wound drain with no wound drain following plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast (breast augmentation, breast reduction and breast reconstruction) in women were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors undertook independent data extraction of study characteristics, methodological quality and outcomes (e.g. infection, other wound complications, pain, and length of hospital stay). Risk of bias was assessed independently by two review authors. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. MAIN
resultsThree randomised trials were identified and included in the review out of 109 studies that were initially screened; all evaluated wound drainage after breast reduction surgery. In total there were 306 women in the three trials, and 505 breasts were studied (254 drained, and 251 who were not drained). Apart from a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay for those participants who did not have drains (MD 0.77; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.14), there was no statistically significant impact of the use of drains on outcomes. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe limited evidence available shows no significant benefit of using post-operative wound drains in reduction mammoplasty, though hospital stay may be shorter when drains are not used. No data are available for breast augmentation or breast reconstruction, and this requires investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.