SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Prebiotics in infants for prevention of allergy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
95 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutrition and Gut Microbiome in the Prevention of Food Allergy.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on the prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: an umbrella meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Prebiotics for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on the infant gut microbiota and other health outcomes: A systematic review.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Dietary modifications for infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Diet during pregnancy and infancy and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of associations between environmental exposures and development of asthma in children aged up to 9 years.BMJ open · 2014Pooled it
- Prebiotics in infants for prevention of allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Cow's milk-based beverage consumption in 1- to 4-year-olds and allergic manifestations: an RCT.Nutrition journal · 2016Trial
- Prebiotic effect during the first year of life in healthy infants fed formula containing GOS as the only prebiotic: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.European journal of nutrition · 2015Trial
- Bridging environmental pollution and immune dysregulation: How microplastics disrupt gut homeostasis to promote allergic diseases.Virulence · 2026Review
- From Diet to Dysbiosis: How Nutritional Factors Shape Gut Microbiota and Drive Airway Inflammation in Pediatric Asthma.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Systematic Evaluation of How Indicators of Inequity and Disadvantage Are Measured and Reported in Population Health Evidence Syntheses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Accounting for the health risk of probiotics.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Non-pharmacological interventions for asthma prevention and management across the life course: Umbrella review.Clinical and translational allergy · 2024Review
- From Birth to Weaning: A Window of Opportunity for Microbiota.Nutrients · 2024Review
- The Role of the Microbiome in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Asthma.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Pre-, pro-, syn-, and Postbiotics in Infant Formulas: What Are the Immune Benefits for Infants?Nutrients · 2023Review
35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrebiotics (commonly oligosaccharides) added to infant feeds have the potential to prevent sensitisation of infants to dietary allergens.
objectivesTo determine the effect of prebiotic given to infants for the prevention of allergy. SEARCH
methodsWe performed an updated search in August 2012 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 8), MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, citations, expert informants and clinical trials registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the use of a prebiotic to no prebiotic, or a specific prebiotic compared to a different prebiotic in infants for prevention of allergy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Assessment of trial quality, data extraction and synthesis of data were performed using the standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN
resultsThe 2012 update identified 13 studies classified as ongoing or awaiting classification (yet to report allergy outcomes). Forty-three studies were excluded, primarily as no allergy data were reported, although none of these enrolled infants were at high risk of allergy. Four studies enrolling 1428 infants were eligible for inclusion. All studies were at high risk of attrition bias. Allergy outcomes were reported from four months to two years of age.Meta-analysis of two studies (226 infants) found no significant difference in infant asthma although significant heterogeneity was found between studies. Meta-analysis of four studies found a significant reduction in eczema (1218 infants, typical risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97; typical risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.00; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 25, 95% CI 14 to > 100; P = 0.03). No statistically significant heterogeneity was found between studies. One study reported no significant difference in urticaria.No statistically significant subgroup differences were found according to infant risk of allergy or type of infant feed. However, individual studies reported a significant reduction in asthma and eczema from supplementation with a mixture of galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharide (GOS/FOS 9:1 ratio) (8 g/L) in infants at high risk of allergy; and in eczema from supplementation with GOS/FOS (9:1) (6.8 g/L) and acidic oligosacccharide (1.2 g/L) in infants not selected for allergy risk. AUTHORS'
conclusionsFurther research is needed before routine use of prebiotics can be recommended for prevention of allergy in formula fed infants. There is some evidence that a prebiotic supplement added to infant feeds may prevent eczema. It is unclear whether the use of prebiotic should be restricted to infants at high risk of allergy or may have an effect in low risk populations; or whether it may have an effect on other allergic diseases including asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.