Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23543536›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Antibiotics for acute laryngitis in adults.

Ludovic Reveiz, Andrés Felipe Cardona

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics for treatment of sore throat in children and adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics for acute laryngitis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Antibiotics for sore throat.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Hoarseness-causes and treatments.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Ludovic ReveizResearch Promotion and Development Team, Health Systems Based on Primary Health Care (HSS), Pan American Health Organization,Washington DC, USA. mmreveiz@hotmail.com
Andrés Felipe Cardona
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá · COWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 2, 2007 of The Cochrane Library. Acute laryngitis is a common illness worldwide. Diagnosis is often made by case history alone and treatment is often directed toward controlling symptoms.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of different antibiotic therapies in adults with acute laryngitis. A secondary objective was to report the rates of adverse events associated with these treatments. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL 2012, Issue 12, MEDLINE (January 1966 to January week 3, 2013), EMBASE (1974 to January 2013), LILACS (1982 to January 2013) and BIOSIS (1980 to January 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any antibiotic therapy with placebo for acute laryngitis. The main outcome was objective voice scores. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted and descriptively synthesised data. MAIN

resultsOnly two trials met the study inclusion criteria after extensive literature searches. One hundred participants were randomised to receive either penicillin V (800 mg twice a day for five days), or an identical placebo, in a study of acute laryngitis in adults. A tape recording of each patient reading a standardised text was obtained during the first visit, subsequently during re-examination after one and two weeks, and at follow-up after two to six months. No significant differences were found between the groups. The trial also measured symptoms reported by participants and found no significant differences.The second trial investigated erythromycin for treating acute laryngitis in 106 adults. The mean objective voice scores measured at the first visit, at re-examination after one and two weeks, and at follow-up after two to six months did not significantly differ between control and intervention groups. At one week there were significant beneficial differences in the severity of reported vocal symptoms as judged by the participants (P = 0.042). Comparing the erythromycin and placebo groups on subjective voice scores, the a priori risk ratio (RR) was 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.96, P = 0.034) and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) was 4.5. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAntibiotics appear to have no benefit in treating acute laryngitis. Erythromycin could reduce voice disturbance at one week and cough at two weeks when measured subjectively. We consider that these outcomes are not relevant in clinical practice. The implications for practice are that prescribing antibiotics should not be done in the first instance as they will not objectively improve symptoms.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycinHumansLaryngitisPenicillin VRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycinPenicillin V

Identifiers

PMID23543536
OpenAlexW4239958341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.