ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013
Enabling interspecies epigenomic comparison with CEpBrowser.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing genomic and epigenomic features across species using the WashU Comparative Epigenome Browser.Genome research · 2023Article
- Multi-View Design Patterns and Responsive Visualization for Genomics Data.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2023Review
- EpiAlignment: alignment with both DNA sequence and epigenomic data.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Tasks, Techniques, and Tools for Genomic Data Visualization.Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics · 2019Article
- Systematic chromatin state comparison of epigenomes associated with diverse properties including sex and tissue type.Nature communications · 2015Article
- Comparative epigenomics: defining and utilizing epigenomic variations across species, time-course, and individuals.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryWe developed the Comparative Epigenome Browser (CEpBrowser) to allow the public to perform multi-species epigenomic analysis. The web-based CEpBrowser integrates, manages and visualizes sequencing-based epigenomic datasets. Five key features were developed to maximize the efficiency of interspecies epigenomic comparisons. AVAILABILITY: CEpBrowser is a web application implemented with PHP, MySQL, C and Apache. URL: http://www.cepbrowser.org/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.