Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23543332›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2013

Use of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective inguinal hernia repair in adults in London and south-east England: a cross-sectional survey.

A M Aiken, J B Haddow, N R A Symons, S Kaptanis, A C Katz-Summercorn, D Debnath, H Dent, S Tayeh, V Kung, S Clark and 26 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Supportive technology in collaborative research: proposing the STiCR framework.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2020
    Review
  5. Inguinal hernia repair in Nigeria: a survey of surgical trainees.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Antibiotic prophylaxis in open inguinal hernia repair: a literature review and summary of current knowledge.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2016
    Review
  10. A national trainee-led audit of inguinal hernia repair in Scotland.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. [Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic and soft tissue surgery].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2014
    Article
  13. The danger of performing meta-analysis and the impact of guidelines.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

A M Aikenc/o National Centre for Bowel Research and Surgical Innovation, 1st Floor Abernathy Building, 2 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, UK.
J B Haddow
N R A Symons
S Kaptanis
A C Katz-Summercorn
D Debnath
H Dent
S Tayeh
V Kung
S Clark
J Gahir
S Dindyal
S Farag
A Lazaridis
C P Bretherton
S Williams
A Currie
H West
J Davies
S Arora
A Kheraj
B M Stubbs
N Yassin
S Mallappa
G Garrett
S Hislop
A Bhangu
Y Abbey
I Al-Shoek
U Ahmad
G Sharp
A Memarzadeh
A Patel
F Ali
H Kaderbhai
C H Knowles

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence regarding whether or not antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing post-operative surgical site infection in adult inguinal hernia repair is conflicting. A recent Cochrane review based on 17 randomised trials did not reach a conclusion on this subject. This study aimed to describe the current practice and determine whether clinical equipoise is prevalent.

methodsSurgeons in training were recruited to administer the Survey of Hernia Antibiotic Prophylaxis usE survey to consultant-level general surgeons in London and the south-east of England on their practices and beliefs regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in adult elective inguinal hernia repair. Local prophylaxis guidelines for the participating hospital sites were also determined.

resultsThe study was conducted at 34 different sites and received completed surveys from 229 out of a possible 245 surgeons, a 93 % response rate. Overall, a large majority of hospital guidelines (22/28) and surgeons' personal beliefs (192/229, 84 %) supported the use of single-dose pre-operative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in inguinal hernia repair, although there was considerable variation in the regimens in use. The most widely used regimen was intravenous co-amoxiclav (1.2 g). Less than half of surgeons were adherent to their own hospital antibiotic guidelines for this procedure, although many incorrectly believed that they were following these.

conclusionIn the south-east of England, there is a strong majority of surgical opinion in favour of the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in this procedure. It is therefore likely to be extremely difficult to conduct further randomised studies in the UK to support or refute the effectiveness of prophylaxis in this commonly performed procedure.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisElective Surgical ProceduresHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleGuideline AdherenceHospitalizationHumansMaleSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID23543332
PMCPMC3788180
OpenAlexW2165649639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.