ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2013
Morphometric study of the T6 vertebra and its three ossification centers in the human fetus.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT Morphometric Analysis of Ossification Centres in the Fetal Th12 Vertebra.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Digital Image Analysis of Vertebral Body S1 and Its Ossification Center in the Human Fetus.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine development in vivo: a retrospective study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Neuraxial dysraphism inNeurology. Genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Quantitative anatomy of the ilium's primary ossification center in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2018Article
- Morphometric study of the neural ossification centers of the atlas and axis in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2016Article
- Digital image analysis of ossification centers in the axial dens and body in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2016Article
- Morphometric study of the two fused primary ossification centers of the clavicle in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2016Article
- Three-dimensional growth dynamics of the liver in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeKnowledge on the normative growth of the spine is critical in the prenatal detection of its abnormalities. We aimed to study the size of T6 vertebra in human fetuses with the crown-rump length of 115-265 mm. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing the methods of computed tomography (Biograph mCT), digital image analysis (Osirix 3.9) and statistics, the normative growth of the T6 vertebral body and the three ossification centers of T6 vertebra in 55 spontaneously aborted human fetuses (27 males, 28 females) aged 17-30 weeks were studied.
resultsNeither male-female nor right-left significant differences were found. The height, transverse, and sagittal diameters of the T6 vertebral body followed natural logarithmic functions as y = -4.972 + 2.732 × ln(age) ± 0.253 (R (2) = 0.72), y = -14.862 + 6.426 × ln(age) ± 0.456 (R (2) = 0.82), and y = -10.990 + 4.982 × ln(age) ± 0.278 (R (2) = 0.89), respectively. Its cross-sectional area (CSA) rose proportionately as y = -19.909 + 1.664 × age ± 2.033 (R (2) = 0.89), whereas its volumetric growth followed the four-degree polynomial function y = 19.158 + 0.0002 × age(4) ± 7.942 (R (2) = 0.93). The T6 body ossification center grew logarithmically in both transverse and sagittal diameters as y = -14.784 + 6.115 × ln(age) ± 0.458 (R (2) = 0.81) and y = -12.065 + 5.019 × ln(age) ± 0.315 (R (2) = 0.87), and proportionately in both CSA and volume like y = -15.591 + 1.200 × age ± 1.470 (R (2) = 0.90) and y = -22.120 + 1.663 × age ± 1.869 (R (2) = 0.91), respectively. The ossification center-to-vertebral body volume ratio was gradually decreasing with age. On the right and left, the neural ossification centers revealed the following models: y = -15.188 + 6.332 × ln(age) ± 0.629 (R (2) = 0.72) and y = -15.991 + 6.600 × ln(age) ± 0.629 (R (2) = 0.74) for length, y = -6.716 + 2.814 × ln(age) ± 0.362 (R (2) = 0.61) and y = -7.058 + 2.976 × ln(age) ± 0.323 (R (2) = 0.67) for width, y = -5.665 + 0.591 × age ± 1.251 (R (2) = 0.86) and y = -11.281 + 0.853 × age ± 1.653 (R (2) = 0.78) for CSA, and y = -9.279 + 0.849 × age ± 2.302 (R (2) = 0.65) and y = -16.117 + 1.155 × age ± 1.832 (R (2) = 0.84) for volume, respectively.
conclusionsNeither sex nor laterality differences are found in the morphometric parameters of evolving T6 vertebra and its three ossification centers. The growth dynamics of the T6 vertebral body follow logarithmically for its height, and both sagittal and transverse diameters, linearly for its CSA, and four-degree polynomially for its volume. The three ossification centers of T6 vertebra increase logarithmically in both transverse and sagittal diameters, and linearly in both CSA and volume. The age-specific reference intervals for evolving T6 vertebra present the normative values of potential relevance in the diagnosis of congenital spinal defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.