Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2013
Administration of the selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin facilitates expulsion of size 5-10 mm distal ureteral stones, as compared to control.
Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Role of silodosin as medical expulsive therapy in ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Urolithiasis · 2018Pooled it
- Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Comparison of silodosin to tamsulosin for medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Urolithiasis · 2016Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Pooled it
- A comparison of nifedipine and tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy for the management of lower ureteral stones without ESWL.Scientific reports · 2014Pooled it
- Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyPooled it
- Alpha-blockers: the magic pill for endourology-The great delusion.World journal of urology · 2024Review
- Acute management of stones: when to treat or not to treat?World journal of urology · 2015Review
- Silodosin as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRecently, we reported that alpha 1A-adrenoceptor (AR) is the main participant in phenylephrine-induced human ureteral contraction. We therefore decided to carry out a prospective randomized study to evaluate the effects of silodosin, a selective alpha 1A AR antagonist, as a medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteral stones.
methodsA total of 112 male patients, who were referred to our department for the management of symptomatic unilateral distal ureteral calculi of less than 10 mm, were randomly divided into two groups: group A (56 patients) who were instructed to drink 2 L of water daily and group B (56 patients) who received the same instruction and were also given silodosin (8 mg/daily) for a maximum of 4 weeks. Expulsion rate, expulsion time and need for analgesics were examined.
resultsThe expulsion rate was 55.3 % (56 patients) for group A and 72.7 % (55 patients) for group B (P = 0.106). The expulsion rate for <5 mm was 92.9 % (28 patients) for group A and 69.2 % (26 patients) for group B (P = 0.053). The expulsion rate for ≥ 5 mm was 17.9 % (28 patients) for group A and 75.9 % (29 patients) for group B (P = 0.001). The expulsion time was 13.40 ± 5.90 and 9.29 ± 5.91 days, respectively (P = 0.012). Analgesics were required 1.5 ± 3.1 and 0.3 ± 0.9 times, respectively (P = 0.382). Stone size in expulsion cases was 3.64 ± 1.25 and 5.23 ± 2.32 mm, respectively (P = 0.003).
conclusionsStone size has been identified as an important predictive factor for stone expulsion. Therefore, it is important that administration of silodosin can facilitate expulsion of 1.5 mm or larger distal ureteral stones, as compared to control. We believe that silodosin might have potential as a MET for distal ureteral stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23543140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.