Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23542634›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2013

Live imaging of drug responses in the tumor microenvironment in mouse models of breast cancer.

Elizabeth S Nakasone, Hanne A Askautrud, Mikala Egeblad

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Longitudinal Intravital Imaging Through Clear Silicone Windows.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disease models & mechanisms · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gene Co-Expression Analysis Predicts Genetic Variants Associated with Drug Responsiveness in Lung Cancer.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging the Tumor Microenvironment.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth S NakasoneWatson School of Biological Sciences.
Hanne A Askautrud
Mikala Egeblad
A.S. Watson (Netherlands) · NLCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Research BaseP30DK063720 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VAISSE, CHRISTIAN · 2003 to 2019
$21.8M
Collaborative Innate-Adaptive Immune Regulation of Tumor ProgressionU01CA141451 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KRUMMEL, MATTHEW F · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA141451NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK063720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment plays a pivotal role in tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and the response to anti-cancer therapies. Three-dimensional co-culture systems are frequently used to explicate tumor-stroma interactions, including their role in drug responses. However, many of the interactions that occur in vivo in the intact microenvironment cannot be completely replicated in these in vitro settings. Thus, direct visualization of these processes in real-time has become an important tool in understanding tumor responses to therapies and identifying the interactions between cancer cells and the stroma that can influence these responses. Here we provide a method for using spinning disk confocal microscopy of live, anesthetized mice to directly observe drug distribution, cancer cell responses and changes in tumor-stroma interactions following administration of systemic therapy in breast cancer models. We describe procedures for labeling different tumor components, treatment of animals for observing therapeutic responses, and the surgical procedure for exposing tumor tissues for imaging up to 40 hours. The results obtained from this protocol are time-lapse movies, in which such processes as drug infiltration, cancer cell death and stromal cell migration can be evaluated using image analysis software.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalSubcellular FractionsTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID23542634
PMCPMC3639729
OpenAlexW2092802944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.