Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23542552›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2013

The nitroreductase system of inducible targeted ablation facilitates cell-specific regenerative studies in zebrafish.

David T White, Jeff S Mumm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A genetic reporter for visualizing nitroreductase activity using magnetic resonance imaging.Chemistry methods : new approaches to solving problems in chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Retinal Degeneration and Regeneration in Xenopus laevis Tadpoles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Retinal Degeneration and Regeneration in Xenopus laevis Tadpoles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The neuroimmune interface in retinal regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New pathways to neurogenesis: Insights from injury-induced retinal regeneration.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David T WhiteNeuroscience Graduate Program, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Jeff S Mumm
Augusta University Health · USDiscovery Institute · US

Funding

New Transgenic Tools for Studying Neural Circuit FormationR21MH083614 · NIMH · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI MUMM, JEFFREY · 2008 to 2009
$404k
Targeted Cellular Ablation in Transgenic ZebrafishR43HD047089 · NICHD · LUMINOMICS, INC. · PI MUMM, JEFFREY S. · 2004 to 2004
$107k
NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD047089NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH083614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the turn of the 20th century, classical regenerative biology--the study of organismal/tissue/limb regeneration in animals such as crayfish, snails, and planaria--garnered much attention. However, scientific luminaries such as Thomas Hunt Morgan eventually turned to other fields after concluding that inquiries into regenerative mechanisms were largely intractable beyond observational intrigues. The field of regeneration has enjoyed a resurgence in research activity at the turn of the 21st century, in large part due to "the promise" of cultured stem cells regarding reparative therapeutic approaches. Additionally, genomics-based methods that allow sophisticated genetic/molecular manipulations to be carried out in nearly any species have extended organismal regenerative biology well beyond observational limits. Throughout its history, complex paradigms such as limb regeneration--involving multiple tissue/cell types, thus, potentially multiple stem cell subtypes--have predominated the regenerative biology field. Conversely, cellular regeneration--the replacement of specific cell types--has been studied from only a few perspectives (predominantly muscle and mechanosensory hair cells). Yet, many of the degenerative diseases that regenerative biology hopes to address involve the loss of individual cell types; thus, a primary emphasis of the embryonic/induced stem cell field is defining culture conditions which promote cell-specific differentiation. Here we will discuss recent methodological approaches that promote the study of cell-specific regeneration. Such paradigms can reveal how the differentiation of specific cell types and regenerative potential of discrete stem cell niches are regulated. In particular, we will focus on how the nitroreductase (NTR) system of inducible targeted cell ablation facilitates: (1) large-scale genetic and chemical screens for identifying factors that regulate regeneration and (2) in vivo time-lapse imaging experiments aimed at investigating regenerative processes more directly. Combining powerful screening and imaging technologies with targeted ablation systems can expand our understanding of how individual stem cell niches are regulated. The former approach promotes the development of therapies aimed at enhancing regenerative potentials in humans, the latter facilitates investigation of phenomena that are otherwise difficult to resolve, such as the role of cellular transdifferentiation or the innate immune system in regenerative paradigms.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotransformationCell DeathCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell TransdifferentiationDrug Delivery SystemsEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansMacrophagesMetronidazoleNitroreductasesProdrugsRegenerationRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsTime-Lapse ImagingEscherichia coli ProteinsMetronidazoleNfsA protein, E coliNitroreductasesProdrugsAblationNitroreductaseRegenerationRetinaStem cellsTime-lapseZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID23542552
PMCPMC3723733
OpenAlexW1986366086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.