Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2013
Clinical effect of individualized parenteral nutrition vs conventional method in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic SCT.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and economic impacts of clinical pharmacists' interventions in Iran: a systematic review.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of perioperative individualized nutrition intervention on pancreatic surgery outcomes: a prospective single-center study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Trial
- Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of malnutrition in hematologic malignancies: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Impact of lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition on platelets: a literature review.Journal of nutritional science · 2024Review
- Post-Transplant Complications in Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)-A Comparative Analysis of Home Care versus Hospitalized Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Observational
- Changes in body weight and serum liver tests associated with parenteral nutrition compared with no parenteral nutrition in patients with acute myeloid leukemia during remission induction treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition in patients undergoing hematopoietic SCT is known as a risk factor for adverse effects and is directly or indirectly responsible for excess mortality and morbidity. We designed the present study to evaluate the effects of individualized parenteral nutrition (PN) and compare the present method to the conventional PN. Individualized PN based on the Harris-Benedict equation was administered to 30 patients after hematopoietic SCT and was compared with an age, gender and disease matched group of patients who underwent hematopoietic SCT with conventional PN. These two groups were compared on clinical, hematological, nutritional outcomes. Comparing duration of hospital stay (P value<0.0001), infection (P value = 0.01), time to platelet engraftment (P value = 0.02), units of packed cell transfusion (P value = 0.006) and decrease in body weight (P value = 0.004) showed significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, the use of individualized PN seems more beneficial than conventional PN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.