ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2013
Segmental spinal canal volume in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Postoperative Slip Reduction With Patient-Reported Outcomes at Two Years After Fusion Surgery for Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Study.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Segmental vertebral three-dimensional motion in patients with L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis under weight-bearing conditions.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Efficacy of OLIF combined with pedicle screw internal fixation for lumbar spinal stenosis on spinal canal changes before and after surgery.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- A Change in Global Sagittal Alignment after Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Analysis of Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at Lumbosacral Spine.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?Skeletal radiology · 2018Article
- Article
- A morphometric analysis of all lumbar intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies in degenerative spondylolisthesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016Article
- Management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based review.EFORT open reviews · 2016Review
- Impact of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on spinal canal volume and neural foramen size in three types of lumbar spinal stenosis.Bone & joint research · 2016Article
- Article
- Pelvic retroversion is the key protective mechanism of L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015Article
- Analysis of Inadvertent Intradiscal Injections during Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injection.The Korean journal of pain · 2014Article
- Qualitative and quantitative computed tomographic characteristics of the lumbosacral spine in German Shepherd military working dogs with versus without lumbosacral pain.Journal of veterinary behavior : clinical applications and research : official journal of : Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, International Working Dog Breeding AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background contextLumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), typically characterized by the forward slippage of the superior vertebra of a lumbar motion segment, is a common spinal pathological condition in elderly individuals. Significant deformation and volume changes of the spinal canal can occur because of the vertebral slippage, but few data have been reported on these anatomic variations in DS patients. Whether to restore normal anatomy, such as reduction of the slippage and restoration of disc height, is still not clear in surgery. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the volume change of the spinal canal and detect specific anatomic factors affecting the spinal canal volume in DS patients. STUDY DESIGN/
settingA case-control study.
methodsNine asymptomatic volunteers (mean age 54.4) and 9 patients with L4/L5 DS (mean age 73.4) were recruited. All patients had intermittent claudication and different extent low back pain, and two patients also had leg pain. L4/L5 vertebral motion segment unit of each subject was reconstructed using three-dimensional computed tomography or magnetic resonance images in a solid modeling software. In vivo lumbar vertebral motion during functional postures (supine, standing upright, flexion, and extension) was determined using a dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. The volume of the spinal canal was measured at each functional posture. Various anatomic parameters (disc height, cross-sectional area of the canal, left-right diameter of the canal, anterior-posterior diameter of the canal, slippage, posture, intervertebral disc angle [DA], etc.) that may potentially affect the canal volume were also measured, and their correlations with the volume change of spinal canal were analyzed. This study was funded by a 2-year, $275,000 grant from the National Institutes of Health.
resultsOn average, spinal canal volume was larger at supine and flexion postures than at stand and extension postures in both the DS and the asymptomatic groups. Spinal canal volume of the DS patients were significantly lower than that of the asymptomatic subjects under all the four postures (p<.05). Correlation analysis showed that spinal canal volume was strongly affected by the posterior disc height (Pearson correlation coefficient γb=0.822) and the slippage percentage (γb=-0.593) and moderately affected by the anterior disc height (γb=0.300) and the DA (γb=-0.237).
conclusionsThe volume of spinal canal is affected by multiple factors. Increased spinal canal volume at supine and flexion positions may explain the clinical observations of relief of symptoms at these postures in DS patients. The data also suggest that reduction of slipped vertebral body, decrease of DA, intervertebral distraction, and decompression could all be effective to increase the canal volume of DS patients thus to relieve clinical symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.