ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2013
Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Women's psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Cesarean section trends in Barrero, Dominican Republic: a community-level analysis of rates, risk factors, and patient motivations.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- What are the influences on women's preferences and decision-making when planning mode of birth in high-income countries? A qualitative systematic review.AJOG global reports · 2025Review
- Ensuring Quality by a Clinical Audit of the Mode of Birth: The Use of the Robson Classification System.Cureus · 2025Article
- 'Maternal Request' Caesarean Sections and Medical Necessity.Clinical ethics · 2023Article
- The impact of mode of delivery on parent-infant-bonding and the mediating role of birth experience: a comparison of mothers and fathers within the longitudinal cohort study DREAM.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Association of Caesarean delivery and breastfeeding difficulties during the delivery hospitalization: a community-based cohort of women and full-term infants in Alberta, Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023Article
- Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Anesthesia, sex and miscarriage history may influence the association between cesarean delivery and autism spectrum disorder.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Reasons for Increased Caesarean Section Rate in Vietnam: A Qualitative Study among Vietnamese Mothers and Health Care Professionals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries.AIMS public health · 2017Article
- Development of strategies to reduce cesarean delivery rates in iran 2012-2014: a mixed methods study.International journal of preventive medicine · 2014Article
- Mode of childbirth in low-risk pregnancies: Nicaraguan physicians' viewpoints.Maternal and child health journal · 2014Article
- Childhood emotional and behavior problems and their associations with cesarean delivery.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
International rates of operative delivery are consistently higher than the World Health Organization determined is appropriate. This suggests that factors other than clinical indications contribute to cesarean section. Data presented here are from interviews with 115 mothers on the postnatal ward of a hospital in Northeast England during February 2006 to March 2009 after the women underwent either unscheduled or scheduled cesarean childbirth. Using thematic content analysis, we found women's accounts of their experiences largely portrayed cesarean section as everything that they had wanted to avoid, but necessary given their situations. Contrary to popular suggestion, the data did not indicate impersonalized medical practice, or that cesareans were being performed 'on request.' The categorization of cesareans into 'emergency' and 'elective' did not reflect maternal experiences. Rather, many unscheduled cesareans were conducted without indications of fetal distress and most scheduled cesareans were not booked because of 'choice.' The authoritative knowledge that influenced maternal perceptions of the need to undergo operative delivery included moving forward from 'prolonged' labor and scheduling cesarean as a prophylactic to avoid anticipated psychological or physical harm. In spontaneously defending themselves against stigma from the 'too posh to push' label that is currently common in the media, women portrayed debate on the appropriateness of cesarean childbirth as a social critique instead of a health issue. The findings suggest the 'need' for some cesareans is due to misrecognition of indications by all involved. The factors underlying many cesareans may actually be modifiable, but informed choice and healthful outcomes are impeded by lack of awareness regarding the benefits of labor on the fetal transition to extrauterine life, the maternal desire for predictability in their parturition and recovery experiences, and possibly lack of sufficient experience for providers in a variety of vaginal delivery scenarios (non-progressive labor, breech presentation, and/or after previous cesarean).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.