ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Quality colonoscopy: a matter of time, technique or technology?
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effectiveness of walking exercise on the bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a single blind randomized clinical trial study.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Trial
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol solution for bowel cleansing in healthy Korean adults.Yonsei medical journal · 2014Trial
- Endocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017Article
- Appropriateness of colonoscopy requests according to EPAGE-II in the Spanish region of Catalonia.BMC family practice · 2015Article
- Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Instructions.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2015Article
- Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality colonoscopy is defined by the detection of adenomatous polyps at least 25% of the time in men and 15% of the time in women. Recent studies highlight the importance of key aspects of high quality colonoscopy. These include the amount of time spent examining the mucosa or withdrawal time, the quality of withdrawal technique and new technologies which seek to maximize the detection of colonic neoplasia. This review summarizes the latest evidence regarding the role of time, technique and technology in shaping the quality of colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.