Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23539554›Full record

SynthesisHeart (British Cardiac Society)2013

Miscarriage and future maternal cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clare Teresa Oliver-Williams, Emma E Heydon, Gordon C S Smith, Angela M Wood

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reproductive-associated risk factors and incident coronary heart disease in women: an umbrella review.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Update on sex specific risk factors in cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clare Teresa Oliver-WilliamsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, , Cambridge, UK.
Emma E Heydon
Gordon C S Smith
Angela M Wood
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe 2011 American Heart Association guidelines identified pregnancy complications as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in women. However, miscarriage was not mentioned within the guidelines, and there is no consensus on the association between miscarriage and future risk of cardiovascular disease.

objectiveTo confirm or refute the association, a meta-analysis of published papers was conducted. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Scopus were systematically searched to identify appropriate articles. Reference lists were then hand searched for additional relevant titles. STUDY SELECTION: To be included, articles had to assess the association between miscarriage and subsequent cardiovascular disease in otherwise healthy women. Only women who had miscarriages were considered exposed. Pooled association measures, using random effects meta-analysis, were calculated for coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease. Publication bias and between-study heterogeneity were evaluated. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors individually reviewed all studies and extracted data on patient and study characteristics along with cardiovascular outcomes.

results10 studies were identified, with 517 504 individuals included in the coronary heart disease meta-analysis and 134 461 individuals in the cerebrovascular disease analysis. A history of miscarriage was associated with a greater odds of developing coronary heart disease, OR (95% CI) =1.45 (1.18 to 1.78), but not with cerebrovascular disease, OR=1.11 (0.72 to 1.69). There was a strong association between recurrent miscarriage and coronary heart disease OR=1.99 (1.13 to 3.50). Evidence was found for moderate between-study heterogeneity and publication bias in the coronary heart disease analysis.

conclusionsThe meta-analysis indicates that a history of miscarriage or recurrent miscarriage is associated with a greater risk of subsequent coronary heart disease.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousCoronary DiseaseFemaleHumansRisk

Identifiers

PMID23539554
PMCPMC3812894
OpenAlexW2101718326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.