Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23539540›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2013

Impact of disease status and stem cell source on the results of reduced intensity conditioning transplant for Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective study from the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC).

Ambroise Marcais, Raphael Porcher, Marie Robin, Mohamad Mohty, Mauricette Michalet, Didier Blaise, Reza Tabrizi, Laurence Clement, Patrice Ceballos, Etienne Daguindau and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Ambroise MarcaisService d’Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire Necker, Université René Descartes, Institut Imagine, Paris, France. ambroise.marcais@nck.aphp.fr
Raphael Porcher
Marie Robin
Mohamad Mohty
Mauricette Michalet
Didier Blaise
Reza Tabrizi
Laurence Clement
Patrice Ceballos
Etienne Daguindau
Karin Bilger
Nathalie Dhedin
Simona Lapusan
Jacques-Olivier Bay
Cécile Pautas
Frederic Garban
Norbert Ifrah
Gaelle Guillerm
Nathalie Contentin
Jean-Henri Bourhis
Ibrahim Yakoub Agha
Marc Bernard
Jérôme Cornillon
Noel Milpied

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed 191 patients who underwent reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation between 1998 and 2008 for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma and whose data were reported to the French registry. The median follow-up was 36 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, cumulative incidence of relapse and cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality were 63%, 39%, 46%, and 16%, respectively. There was no difference in outcome between patients in complete response and in partial response at the time of transplantation with regards to overall survival (70% versus 74%, no significant difference) and progression-free survival (51% versus 42%, no significant difference). Patients with chemoresistant disease had a shorter overall survival (39% at 3 years; P=0.0003) and progression-free survival (18% at 3 years; P=0.001) than patients in complete remission. The use of umbilical cord blood as the source of stem cells was associated with a poor outcome with an increased risk of death with a hazard ratio of 3.49 (95% confidence interval: 1.26 to 9.63; P=0.016). The use of peripheral blood was associated with a better outcome for patients who where alive 1 year after transplantation with a hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.83; P=0.016). Disease status at transplantation remains the most important risk factor for outcome. Our data suggest that the use of peripheral blood should be preferred whereas umbilical cord blood should be used with caution.

Indexed as

Societies, MedicalAdolescentAdultBone Marrow TransplantationCohort StudiesCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHodgkin DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23539540
PMCPMC3762105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.