Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23539530›Full record

ArticleStroke2013

Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation attenuates brain injury after neonatal stroke.

Cindy T J van Velthoven, R Ann Sheldon, Annemieke Kavelaars, Nikita Derugin, Zinaida S Vexler, Hanneke L D M Willemen, Mirjam Maas, Cobi J Heijnen, Donna M Ferriero

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
28.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cindy T J van VelthovenLaboratory of Neuroimmunology and Developmental Origins of Disease, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.vanvelthoven-2@umcutrecht.nl
R Ann Sheldon
Annemieke Kavelaars
Nikita Derugin
Zinaida S Vexler
Hanneke L D M Willemen
Mirjam Maas
Cobi J Heijnen
Donna M Ferriero
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

White matter injury as predictor of outcome in neonatal brain injuryP50NS035902 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIERO, DONNA M. · 1997 to 2012
$14.0M
Neonatal Stroke: The Role of Microglia-derived Extracellular VesiclesR01NS044025 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VEXLER, ZINAIDA S · 2002 to 2023
$7.7M
Oxidant Mechanisms in Neonatal Brain InjuryR01NS033997 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIERO, DONNA M. · 1996 to 2016
$5.1M
Macrophages as modulators of repair after neonatal strokeR01NS076726 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VEXLER, ZINAIDA S · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS NS35902NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS035902NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033997NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044025NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBrain injury caused by stroke is a frequent cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality with limited therapeutic options. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been shown to improve outcome after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury mainly by secretion of growth factors stimulating repair processes. We investigated whether MSC treatment improves recovery after neonatal stroke and whether MSC overexpressing brain-derived neurotrophic factor (MSC-BDNF) further enhances recovery.

methodsWe performed 1.5-hour transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in 10-day-old rats. Three days after reperfusion, pups with evidence of injury by diffusion-weighted MRI were treated intranasally with MSC, MSC-BDNF, or vehicle. To determine the effect of MSC treatment, brain damage, sensorimotor function, and cerebral cell proliferation were analyzed.

resultsIntranasal delivery of MSC- and MSC-BDNF significantly reduced infarct size and gray matter loss in comparison with vehicle-treated rats without any significant difference between MSC- and MSC-BDNF-treatment. Treatment with MSC-BDNF significantly reduced white matter loss with no significant difference between MSC- and MSC-BDNF-treatment. Motor deficits were also improved by MSC treatment when compared with vehicle-treated rats. MSC-BDNF-treatment resulted in an additional significant improvement of motor deficits 14 days after middle cerebral artery occlusion, but there was no significant difference between MSC or MSC-BDNF 28 days after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Furthermore, treatment with either MSC or MSC-BDNF induced long-lasting cell proliferation in the ischemic hemisphere.

conclusionsIntranasal administration of MSC after neonatal stroke is a promising therapy for treatment of neonatal stroke. In this experimental paradigm, MSC- and BNDF-hypersecreting MSC are equally effective in reducing ischemic brain damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNerve Fibers, MyelinatedNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStrokeBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Identifiers

PMID23539530
PMCPMC3694433
OpenAlexW2118993793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.