Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23539481›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2013

Diagnosis and misdiagnosis of cerebrovascular disease.

Vasileios-Arsenios Lioutas, Shruti Sonni, Louis R Caplan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stroke mimic diagnoses presenting to a hyperacute stroke unit.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vasileios-Arsenios LioutasDepartment of Neurology, Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Shruti Sonni
Louis R Caplan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementStroke is the leading cause of disability and the third leading cause of death in the USA. Ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes must be distinguished since treatment is quite different. Ischemic strokes account for 80 % of the total and recent advances in management of brain ischemia have added valuable options to the physicians' armamentarium. Wise selection and targeted treatment of patients is of paramount importance. Properly treated patients benefit significantly, while those erroneously diagnosed as ischemic stroke are exposed to potentially harmful side effects of therapy. Stroke can present in the form of several different clinical syndromes some of which are difficult to identify. Conversely, there are numerous conditions whose clinical presentation closely resembles stroke, also known as stroke mimics. Ancillary testing, especially imaging, is a crucial part of diagnostic evaluation, while clinical judgment, thorough knowledge of cerebrovascular anatomy and familiarity with characteristic stroke syndromes remain indispensable even in this era of technological advance.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.