ArticleNature2013
Accelerated gene evolution through replication-transcription conflicts.
Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Replication-transcription collisions impose DNA strand-specific constraints on gene length in bacteria.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Processing of reversed replication forks is required for the resolution of replication-transcription conflicts.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Stops Replication Restart by Degrading the RNA within R-loops during Replication-Transcription Conflicts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Polymerase face-off: emerging concepts in transcription-replication coordination.EMBO reports · 2026Review
- Processing of Reversed Replication Forks is Required for the Resolution of Replication-Transcription Conflicts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Transcription-replication collisions trigger high-fidelity replication reset.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- RNA polymerase II is a polar roadblock to a progressing DNA fork.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Participants in Transcription-Replication Conflict and Their Role in Formation and Resolution of R-Loops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Reduced Genetic Heterogeneity for Stable Bioproduction by Harnessing the Bias and Mechanism of Mutation.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Homologous recombination shapes the architecture and evolution of bacterial genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Clues to transcription/replication collision-induced DNA damage: it was RNAP, in the chromosome, with the fork.FEBS letters · 2025Review
- Integrating bacterial molecular genetics with chemical biology for renewed antibacterial drug discovery.The Biochemical journal · 2024Review
- The Whole-Genome Sequencing and Probiotic Profiling ofNutrients · 2024Article
- Homologous Recombination Shapes the Architecture and Evolution of Bacterial Genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Origin, evolution, and maintenance of gene-strand bias in bacteria.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Review
- Transcription-Replication Conflicts as a Source of Genome Instability.Annual review of genetics · 2023Review
- Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023Review
- The divergence of mutation rates and spectra across the Tree of Life.EMBO reports · 2023Review
- RNase H genes cause distinct impacts on RNA:DNA hybrid formation and mutagenesis genome wide.Science advances · 2023Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Several mechanisms that increase the rate of mutagenesis across the entire genome have been identified; however, how the rate of evolution might be promoted in individual genes is unclear. Most genes in bacteria are encoded on the leading strand of replication. This presumably avoids the potentially detrimental head-on collisions that occur between the replication and transcription machineries when genes are encoded on the lagging strand. Here we identify the ubiquitous (core) genes in Bacillus subtilis and determine that 17% of them are on the lagging strand. We find a higher rate of point mutations in the core genes on the lagging strand compared with those on the leading strand, with this difference being primarily in the amino-acid-changing (nonsynonymous) mutations. We determine that, overall, the genes under strong negative selection against amino-acid-changing mutations tend to be on the leading strand, co-oriented with replication. In contrast, on the basis of the rate of convergent mutations, genes under positive selection for amino-acid-changing mutations are more commonly found on the lagging strand, indicating faster adaptive evolution in many genes in the head-on orientation. Increased gene length and gene expression amounts are positively correlated with the rate of accumulation of nonsynonymous mutations in the head-on genes, suggesting that the conflict between replication and transcription could be a driving force behind these mutations. Indeed, using reversion assays, we show that the difference in the rate of mutagenesis of genes in the two orientations is transcription dependent. Altogether, our findings indicate that head-on replication-transcription conflicts are more mutagenic than co-directional conflicts and that these encounters can significantly increase adaptive structural variation in the coded proteins. We propose that bacteria, and potentially other organisms, promote faster evolution of specific genes through orientation-dependent encounters between DNA replication and transcription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.