ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2013
The wave has finally broken: now what?
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining Documentation Burden (DocBurden) and Excessive DocBurden for All Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Celebrating Eta Berner and her influence on biomedical and health informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Applications of Machine Learning Using Electronic Medical Records in Spine Surgery.Neurospine · 2019Article
- Improving Oral-Systemic Healthcare through the Interoperability of Electronic Medical and Dental Records: An Exploratory Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Presentation of laboratory test results in patient portals: influence of interface design on risk interpretation and visual search behaviour.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Bringing functional status into a big data world: Validation of national Veterans Affairs functional status data.PloS one · 2017Article
- Measuring Health Literacy Levels of a Patient Portal Using the CDC's Clear Communication Index.Health promotion practice · 2017Article
- New Unintended Adverse Consequences of Electronic Health Records.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016Article
- Nursing Home Provider Perceptions of Telemedicine for Reducing Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2016Article
- Maximizing Time with the Patient: the Creative Concept of a Physician Scribe.Current oncology reports · 2015Article
- The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Bridging the Gap: A Collaborative Approach to Health Information Management and Informatics Education.Applied clinical informatics · 2015Article
- Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2005, the authors published a paper, 'Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States', which predicted that rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHR) would occur in the next 5 years given appropriate incentives. The wave has finally broken with the stimulus of the health information technology for economic and clinical health legislation in 2009, and there have been both positive and negative developments in the ensuing years. The positive developments, among others described, are increased adoption of EHR, the emergence of a national network infrastructure and the recognition of clinical informatics as a medical specialty. Problems that still exist include, among others described, continued user interface problems, distrust of EHR-generated notes and an increased potential for fraud and abuse. It is anticipated that in the next 5 years there will be near universal EHR adoption, greater emphasis on standards and interoperability, greater involvement of Congress in health information technology (IT), breakthroughs in user interfaces, compelling online medical and IT education, both increased use of data analytics for personalized healthcare and a realization of the difficulties of this approach, a blurring of the distinction between EHR and telemedicine, a resurgence of computer-assisted diagnosis and the emergence of a 'continuously learning' healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.