Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23538553›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Efficacy of the vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease.

Elisa Carrera, Rebeca Manzano, Elena Garrido

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 2019 Expert opinion on biological treatment use in inflammatory bowel disease management.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. A guide to prepare patients with inflammatory bowel diseases for anti-TNF-α therapy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisa CarreraDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Guadalajara, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain. ecarreraa@hotmail.com
Rebeca Manzano
Elena Garrido
Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with conditions that may predispose to infections, such as the lack of an appropriate innate immune response to infectious agents, malnutrition, surgery, and immunosuppressive and biological drugs. Some of these infections may be preventable by vaccination. Therefore, for this particular patient population, the benefits of implementing a well-established immunization protocol in daily clinical practice are potentially even greater than for the general population. In recent years international consensus guidelines have been published, but in spite of theses recommendations, studies have shown that a significant number of patients with IBD remain inadequately immunized. Another important issue regarding immunization in this population is that vaccine efficacy among patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies has been variable. In a healthy population, a humoral immune response to hepatitis B vaccination (HBV) is expected in > 90%, whereas a much lower rate is achieved in the IBD patients. Immunosuppressive, anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and disease activity have been implicated in the impaired efficacy of the vaccination. The serological response to HBV should be confirmed and patients with an inadequate response should receive a second full series of vaccine. Modified dosing regimens, including doubling the standard antigen dose, might increase the effectiveness. Response to influenza, pneumococcal and tetanus immunization is still not clear, as there are studies that show a normal response to the vaccination while others demonstrate a lack of efficacy. We pose a series of questions on the efficacy of the different vaccinations recommended for IBD patients and attempt to answer them using scientific evidence.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostVaccinationBacterial InfectionsBacterial VaccinesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeViral VaccinesVirus DiseasesBacterial VaccinesImmunosuppressive AgentsViral VaccinesEfficacyHepatitis B vaccinesImmunizationImmunosuppressive medicationsInfectionsInflammatory bowel diseaseInfluenza vaccinesPneumococcal vaccinesTetanus vaccinesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID23538553
PMCPMC3602493
OpenAlexW2027109190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.